What can be logically concluded about each option:
- <u><em>Faideaux is the speaker´s only dog.</em></u> No. Because the speaker indicated the name of the dog that won, so he/she must have others;
- <u><em>The speaker has more than one dog.</em></u> Yes. Because the speaker mentioned the dog's name. He/She made it clear that it was Faideaux, not another;
- <u><em>Faideaux is the only one of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</em></u> Faideaux competed and won, but it can not be concluded that it was the only one competing;
- <em><u>Faideaux is among several of the speaker's dogs to compete in the show.</u></em> It also has no way to conclude that the speaker´s dogs were with Faideaux at the county dog show.
Answer:
E.
Explanation:
When she brought up dating he was extremely reticent about his personal life, meaning he was more shy, closed off, E. fits this because he wouldn't reveal what he actually wanted to say.
Answer:
I'll say maybe the third one:
McKenna overheard her mother say on the phone, “We’ll see you in fifteen minutes, Mom.” Fifteen minutes later, the doorbell rang. McKenna thought to herself, “My grandmother is here.”
Explanation:
She analized what her mom said through the phone and though "Well mi mom said that her mom was coming in 15 minutes so when the doorbell rang after 15 min she concluded that it was her grandma.
Hope this Helps God Bless You :)
Answer:
i think it is C for the first one and D for the second one
Explanation: