Part of the goal for US foreign policy is to promote peace and democracy.
An autocracy is a system of government in which supreme power is concentrated in the hands of one person, whose decisions are subject to neither external legal restraints nor regularized mechanisms of popular control (except perhaps for the implicit threat of a coup d'état or mass insurrection).[1] Absolute monarchies (such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, Brunei and Swaziland) and dictatorships (such as Turkmenistan and North Korea) are the main modern-day forms of autocracy.
In earlier times, the term "autocrat" was coined as a favorable feature of the ruler, having some connection to the concept of "lack of conflicts of interests" as well as an indication of grandeur and power. The Russian Tsar for example was styled, "Autocrat of all the Russians", as late as the early 20th century.
Answer:
Andrew Carnegie wrote the gospel of wealth in 1889 in which he argued that wealthy men had a responsibility to use their wealth for the greater good of the society. He believed in laissez-faire economics rewarded those willing to take risks but with success comes great responsibility. <em>According to him Social Darwinism was not about the survival of fittest but about the fittest one of the society should help others to survive.</em>
Answer: It describes the tenuous peace that existed between the two countries as a result of both governments being terrified at the prospect of a world-destroying nuclear war. ... Some political scientists use this phrase as a means of differentiating the world situation that followed World War II from that which preceded it.
Explanation:
