You didn't give the options. However, i'll try.
To me, a stone cannot be ethical because it cannot suffer. Indeed, the capacity for suffering must be satisfied before we talk about interest in a meaningful way. For instance, nothing we could possibly do for a stone could make a difference in its welfare. It don't have interest. Whereas, we, humans have interest. Therefore we can be ethical because we are sentient beings that can be benifited or harmed. It's because we can experience pain as a result.
Hope this helps !
Photon
Answer:
The right answer is "It teaches the reader... is trying to be polite"
Explanation:
In this situation, the reader is presented with a situation that exemplifies cultural differences which, if not understood, may lead to misunderstanding and misjudgement. The minister represents the reader and his/her possible reaction to such situation or a similar one. And <em>being polite</em> is the desired attitude the author seeks the reader to show in case of cultural differences.
Answer:
My teacher gave me this riddle before so i know it. It's like a baby for the four, a kid/grown-up for 2, and then an old person with a cane for 3.
Explanation:
The answer is c I believe :) mark
A static character is not influenced by events around him
a dynamic character changes, or grows, according to the occurrence in his life.
hopefully these are correct :)
