Based on my information, I believe that the higher authorities that would choose the prime ministers would actually be the "house of commons". Going back a few years, many of the "house of commons" actually did not have the responsibility in order to do this, but then, the government figured that it would be better if they were to handle on this responsibility.
<span> The Virginia
Plan wanted representation proportional to the population of the state.
It proposed a bicameral legislature (I think. Don't remember. It's
been a long time!) in which states got seats in both houses based on how
large their population was.
The way it's easy to remember is that Virginia was the biggest state in
the country at the time, so naturally they thought the state with the
biggest population should have the most votes! </span>
Answer:
O B. a ruler denying citizens their rights
Explanation:
According to the Declaration of Independence, when a ruler denies citizens any rights, this ruler is encouraging an open rebellion against the government, as all citizens must fight for their rights to be guaranteed, no matter the situation. This argument was the justification used by the American colonies to combat the British government, since American colonists believed that the management of England limited and denied the rights of American citizens and therefore should be combated.
Answer:
William Tecumseh Sherman (February 8, 1820 – February 14, 1891) was an American soldier, ... He recovered by forging a close partnership with General Ulysses S. Grant. ... and of Confederate President Jefferson Davis, Sherman conditionally agreed to generous terms that dealt with both political and military issues.
Explanation:
This would be an example of an unlimited government system. An unlimited government system is when a leader of a government has no restraints on what they can do with a government.
