Essentially, there are a lot of reasons as to why people turn to both religion and philosophy. This could have something to do with the way they were brought up or their very own beliefs. Each religion has different ways and teachings. For Medieval China, they were traditionally into Taoism and Confucianism since these two provided ethical guides to the proper behavior of individuals and officials. Taoism promoted the inner peace of individuals and harmony with their surroundings. Confucianism, based on the teachings of the famous philosopher Confucius, was an ethical system that sought to teach the proper way for all people to behave in society. <span>Each relationship--husband-wife, parents-children, ruler-subjects--involved a set of obligations which, if upheld, would lead to a just and harmonious society. Following his teachings would also promote a stable, lasting government.</span>
In a working economy, it requires labor to attain natural resources to produce other resources. then once a city is built and currency is established, entrepreneurship is required to buy and sell goods. Lastly, capital is required to keep order in the population
The limitations would be how much evidence was available and the truthfulness of the witnesses. The Code dealt with violations of the law. The law specified punishments based on who you were...slave or master, etc..
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Most people were too scared to cross the church or were on the church's side because they couldn't read the bible (it was written in latin)
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't think teaching has changed all that much in 2000 years to be truthful. Jesus is said to have been a master teacher. He used very few methods: parables, learned references, complete and utter faith in the rightness of the Father. He was successful.
Socrates used questions. His students were never let off the hook. If they faltered in even the smallest detail, he pursued them with a tenacity that forced them to defend themselves. He lived more than 2000 years ago. He was successful -- so much so that Athens feared his influence.
Modern teachers carefully follow a line of thought from Grade 1 to Grade 12. Their objective is vastly different perhaps than the other two. They are interested in preparing students for what they will face when they leave the protection of the school system. You may not agree, but I think they are successful.
What do these examples have in common?
In my opinion the very vast majority of teachers have two qualities in common: they care about the people they teach; they care about the subject matter they are teaching or the skills or the training or whatever you want to call it. Most feel strongly about what they are doing.
Few teachers will ever make the Frobes Billionaire's List if any at all. But they are content with enough.
