1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natasha_Volkova [10]
3 years ago
12

Read the following excerpt about the Inca civilization written by Spanish conquistador, Pedro de Cieza de Leon, taken from the b

ook Chronicles of the Incas.
As this kingdom was so vast, in each of the many provinces there were many storehouses filled with supplies and other needful things; thus, in times of war, wherever the armies went they drew upon the contents of these storehouses, without ever touching the supplies of their confederates or laying a finger on what they had in their settlements . . . Then the storehouses were filled up once more with the tributes paid the Inca. If there came a lean year, the storehouses were opened and the provinces were lent what they needed in the way of supplies; then, in a year of abundance, they paid back all they had received. No one who was lazy or tried to live by the work of others was tolerated; everyone had to work. Thus on certain days each lord went to his lands and took the plow in hand and cultivated the earth, and did other things. Even the Incas themselves did this to set an example. And under their system there was none such in all the kingdom, for, if he had his health, he worked and lacked for nothing; and if he was ill, he received what he needed from the storehouses.

Based on the excerpt, what can you conclude about the Inca government?

It provided for its people during emergency situations.
It exploited its poor and needy by overworking them.
It differentiated between the elite and the poor laborers.
It offered rewards to the empire’s hardest workers.
It gave special privileges to the nobility and their allies.
History
2 answers:
saveliy_v [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

It provided for its people during emergency situations.

Explanation:

The text shows that people, besides working for their own livelihoods, worked to fill the city's supply stores, because if there was an emergency situation (such as wars, droughts, natural disasters and diseases) that would prevent people from working , the government would provide whatever they needed by withdrawing supplies from the warehouses.

When the emergency situation was over and people could work again, they would return to the warehouse what they consumed and so the stock would never end.

sergeinik [125]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The correct answer is "It provided for its people during emergency situations"

Explanation:

The principal focus of these excerpt is to demonstrate with examples how the Inca government was organized and prepared to deal with an emergency situation, such as a war, by having these storehouses in every province as a way to provide supplies to those in need, whether it´d be the soldiers, or the people from the provinces themselves, who might be going through unusual circumstances. It also talks about the work ethics of the Incas, describing how devoted they were to their labours, however, there is no mention of exploitation or mandatory labor, which is why "option 2" is incorrect. And although a difference is referenced between the lords and peasants, it was only used to exemplify their work ethics, which is why "option 3" is wrong. Finally, it's implied that every Inca was entitled to receive whatever they needed from the storehouses in an emergency situation, as mentioned in the last paragraph "And under their system there was none such in all the kingdom, for, if he had his health, he worked and lacked for nothing; and if he was ill, he received what he needed from the storehouses"; discarding "option 4 and 5".

You might be interested in
Which social conflict of the 1920s was addressed in the Scopes trial?
Semenov [28]
The answer is D. hope this helps!
7 0
3 years ago
What seemed to cause the differences in opinions regarding government relief programs?
mario62 [17]

On one hand, you have the belief that money could be better spent than assigning it to government relief programs. It states that these funds will unadequately used and will not efectively achieve its original purpose. On the ther hand, you have the belief that more money should be spent in these programs because it will help reduce the issue of inequality. People who recieve this aid will have the chance to improve their quality of life by getting access to better education and health services.

3 0
3 years ago
Who is known as the father of history?<br><br> Socrates<br> Herodotus<br> Plato<br> Aristotle
MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Answer:

herodotus is known as the father

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
7. Evaluate What purpose might Griffin have had for writing this piece? Given that purpose, how effective is Griffin's argument?
nordsb [41]

Answer:

<h3>To make readers realize that the values that the American  space program contributes.</h3><h3 />

Explanation:

  • The purpose that Michael D. Griffin has written this article is to make readers realize the values that the American space program contributes.
  • He argues by establishing that there are Real Reasons which are intuitive and compelling in humans. These reasons make people to stand out in a particular society. They are the qualities that drives an individual to venture into the unknown and make a breakthrough.
  • Similarly, space programs are also motivated by Real Reasons and just not for for economic gains. Though most people think that space programs have no real purpose, Griffin argues that it has it has contributed to America's greatness in the world both in terms of value and Accepted Reasons which are economic benefit, scientific discovery, and national  security.
4 0
3 years ago
"how do you think the existence of nearly 3,000 ethnic groups and 800 languages affect life in countries of the sahara"
emmasim [6.3K]

  The enormous amount of ethnicities and languages in the countries of Sahara contributed to mainly bad and unwanted things to be happening. In lots of the countries there's big devidence between the ethnic groups and it is not unusual that they have clashes that very often have devastating consequences. The countries of the southern half of Sahara usually have clashes on daily basis and there's open hatred and violence between the different ethnic groups, which also leads to the governments having enormous difficulties in the control of some regions. In the northern half of Sahara there has been a systematic genocide going on for quite some time that is kept behind the curtains, like the example with the Barbers and the Jews of North Africa whose numbers have been significantly falling down and they have been massacred systematically by other groups.

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is pastoral farming
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes a similarity between the political systems in ancient Greece and the Roman Republic?
    15·1 answer
  • To govern the Americas, Spain divided its lands into different units known as
    13·2 answers
  • How do you think mercantilism influence the relationship between the colonists and England?
    6·1 answer
  • Which explains how the end of the Dirty War affected military rule in Argentina?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did African slaves commit suicide
    6·2 answers
  • According to Chief Justice John Marshall, why was the Judiciary Act of 1789<br> unconstitutional?
    12·1 answer
  • Luca
    15·1 answer
  • Artifacts have more historical value than written<br> records because...
    7·2 answers
  • What was the toleration act of 1649?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!