The choices can be found elsewhere and as follows:
<span>-It struck down the use of strict racial quotas.
-It ruled race could not be factored into admissions.
-It limited diversity and inequality in the workplace.
-It changed the way applications could be written.
I think the correct answer is the first option. </span>Regents v. Bakke change affirmative action policies by striking down the use of strict racial quotas.
Answer:
The decline of the Maurya Dynasty was rather rapid after the death of Ashoka/Asoka. One obvious reason for it was the succession of weak kings. Another immediate cause was the partition of the Empire into two.
Explanation:
Answer: Abolitionists
Explanation: This law required that fugitive slaves seeking freedom be captured and sent back to their masters as part of a compromise in Congress (this angered Abolitionists, who believed escaped slaves deserved freedom).
It awakened general interest in the different arts as medium of expression
British raj, period of direct British rule over the Indian subcontinent from 1858 until the independence of India and Pakistan in 1947. The raj succeeded management of the subcontinent by the British East India Company, after general distrust and dissatisfaction with company leadership resulted in a widespread mutiny of sepoy troops in 1857, causing the British to reconsider the structure of governance in India. The British government took possession of the company’s assets and imposed direct rule. The raj was intended to increase Indian participation in governance, but the powerlessness of Indians to determine their own future without the consent of the British led to an increasingly adamant national independence movement.
