Actually most were happy to leave the swamp of trying to force peace onto the ever warring greeks
False the temperance movement was about stopping the sale of liquor. Women’s suffrage was about women’s rights.
1. The Cold War didn’t lead to a single big conflict, rather many smaller ones.
2. The USA and USSR were both trying to spread its ideals. The USA spreading Democracy and freedom, while the USSR spread controlling and unfair communism and socialism. They would spread these ideals by influencing smaller nations. And sometimes they would influence the same nation and cause a civil war/revolution. These consist of The Korean War and Vietnam.
3. The Cold War eventually came to an end when USSR officials started loosening restrictions for the country. Until it eventually separated and became Russia followed by many others. Thus ending the Cold War.
Answer:
Henan, a province in Central China’s Yellow River Valley, is widely recognized as the place where Chinese civilization originated. The one child policy significantly curbed population growth, though there is no consensus on the magnitude. Under the policy, households tried to have additional children without breaking the law; some unintended consequences include higher reported rates of twin births and more Han- minority marriages.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. It is not true that the Plessy v. Ferguson case paved the way for the Little Rock 9 to attend Central High School.
Explanation:
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court in 1896 that ruled on the constitutionality of the right of the states of the Union to impose racial segregation in public places under the "separate but equal" doctrine.
The court decided, by 7 votes to 1, to declare that segregation in the southern states did not violate the Constitution (in particular the 14th Amendment which stated that all citizens were equal before the law). Judge Henry Billings Brown, speaking for the majority that approved the decision, said that the segregation done in the state of Louisiana did not imply inferiority, in the eyes of the law, of African Americans and that the separation by race in public places and services was a mere political issue. The dissenting voice within the Court, Judge John Marshall Harlan, strongly condemned his colleagues and said that this decision would be as negatively striking as the "Dred Scott Case". He added that the law of the United States did not state that the country had a caste system, that the constitution did not see the color of its citizens' skin and that everyone was equal under the law. Several jurists agreed with Harlan and the nation was divided over it. The southern states, however, rejoiced that their system of segregation by race now had a legal basis to support itself.
