Answer: Tiit -for -tat strategy
Explanation:
Tiit -for -tat was introduced by Anatol Rapoport. He developed a strategy in which each participant in follows a course of action consistent with his opponent's previous turn. In other words, the opponents previuous moves are mimicked.This is an action is of mutual benefit. This strategy is an example of reciprocal altruism and cooperation.
By creating Jim Crow laws. Which made them “Separate but equal”
Answer:
it expanded their territory and increased the creation of city-states. trade brought goods, it also brought along with it foreign ideas, beliefs, and customs to the country carried by the people
Explanation:
Answer:
Compromises and Act.
Explanation:
The compromises and Act were related to the question of slavery. The South relied on agriculture and took the slavery system as legal to generate wealth. Whereas the North were against the practice of slavery they considered it evil because it bound people to their masters without having rights and freedom.
Missouri Compromise became the first compromise related to slavery. The Compromise established Missouri as a slave and Maine as a free state. The purpose of the compromise was to maintain the balance of power in the Senate.
The westward migration in California led the government to introduce the compromise of 1850. The Compromise of 1850 reduced the political dispute over slavery in new territories after the Mexican-American War.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act passed by the government in 1854. It allowed Kansas and Nebraska to decide whether to allow slavery or not.
Answer:
B. Couples could not afford lawyers to go through with divorce.
Explanation:
The Great Depression was a global economic depression that occurred in 1930s, it began in US in 1929.
The divorce rates declined during the Great Depression because people couldn't afford to get divorced. Divorce rates declined by 25 percent between 1929 and 1933, it rose during 30s. Great depression didn't prevent the divorces but postponed it.<em> Divorce rates were 1.6 per 1000 people in 1930 and 1.3 in 1933. </em>
