Judicial, Executive, and Legislative
Answer:
Explanation:
Massacre: an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.
“an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of many people” Many is of course “A large quantity”. So there we have it, certainly more than a couple but if it gets to be say 100,000, which is definitely a large number, I suspect that might be encroaching into the realms of genocide.
OK so if you happen upon a car crash and there are bodies spread over the scene, 2 from each of the 2 cars, then you would immediately spot, just by looking there were 4 people involved, but if it was a pair of coaches each with 52 passengers and they were all spread around the scene you wouldn’t be able to put a number to it by just sweeping your eyes across the mess, perhaps then it is getting to be a massacre. Could that be a useful definition? If the number slaughtered is more than you can estimate merely with a look? I also think it needs to be within a definable area, like a football field, or a stadium or perhaps a town. If it involved a whole region of a country then it becomes Genocide, maybe.
Could it be then The indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of more people within a definable area than you can estimate readily with a sweep of your eyes.
Just a suggestion, so go gently on me ………….
<u>Answer:</u>
Yes, Warren Harding was successful in bringing the country back to normalcy.
<u>Explanation:</u>
During the elections the main agenda or slogan of Warren Harding was “return to normalcy”. He did win the popular elections and became the President. Government supported the new way of life and helped people return to normalcy after the World War I.
America’s economy was on a new high. There was mass production of consumer goods, so every house had these goods. He fulfilled the promise of returning the mentality of the people to pre-war days. Harding campaigned “America first” and there were restrictions of immigration into the country.
