<span>The Mughal Empire granted trading rights to Europeans, so the Europeans had already build a large base for trading in the region. The Europeans were allowed to build forts and warehouses for their own protection, and as the Mughal empire weakened the British seized their chance to invade, the British and weakening Mughals fought for power. By the 1700's, The British East India Company controlled most of India forcing it inhabits to slave over them.</span>
A shogun is a Japanese Emporer
Answer:
Hedonism and utilitarianism are similar in their evaluation of the goal of moral behaviour as some version of pleasure or happiness and the minimization of its opposite. They can both view pleasure or happiness as simple and immediate, or complex and matured. Where they differ is the scope of evaluation which justifies the behaviour as moral. Hedonism tends to be individualistic while utilitarianism tends to be social. A utilitarian must evaluate the happiness result for the total consequence of an action, which typically effects many people. A hedonist could very well throw consequences to the wind if the action feels good to him or herself. In a sense, you might consider utilitarianism to be model for social hedonism.
Explanation:
<span>Virginia Company of London. Did.
</span>
