If u show the graph i can help but no graph are shown
<span>The Virginia Plan preferred representation based upon "population," since such a plan would have greatly benefitted the more populus states such as Virginia. </span>
Hi Justin
The answer is : Archimedes
I hope it is one of the options
I hope that's help... Please rate :)
Answer:
- Compare sources to analyze their content for historical bias.
- Approach current interpretations of past events as historical fiction.
Explanation:
Though you can distinguished hindsight bias everywhere in human history, the event was first defined and analyzed as such. We might further look at all the positions and secondary aspects and understand that given these variables, it was apparent what was going to follow. Early studies asked individuals annual-classification trivia puzzles or required them to anticipate federal elections; they asked members to evoke their foresight. You might step away from the movie believing that you knew it all along, but the truth is that you plausibly didn't. When a drama approaches its end, and we learn who the killer was, we may look behind on our concept of the movie and misremember our primary impressions of the guilty character.
Your questions asks why the Southern Military (Confederacy) decided to defend instead of attack.
Your answer would be C). Southern leaders thought their knowledge of Southern lands would help them defeat the Union forces.
The reason why this would be the correct answer is because the South believed that their knowledge of their land would give them the advantage in winning the war. In other words, you can say that the South "played home field." The terrain in the South was different than the terrain in the North, so they used it to get the Northerners (the Union) confused when trying to attack them. The Southerners knew where everything is: all of the bases, hiding spots, etc, and used it to a certain advantage. All in all, the Southern leaders thought that the Union would be weaker on unknown territory.
