In the sentence that has a parallel structure, the error is given in option (B). The business manager is bright, extremely creative, and generous with her thoughts.
<h3>How does parallel structure work?</h3>
A stylistic device known as the parallel structure is a grammatical formation made up of two or more clauses, phrases, or words that have the same length and grammatical form.
Parallelism is comparable to it. By maintaining the rhythm of the lines, sentences with a parallel structure consist of a number of phrases or clauses that begin and end almost in the same way.
These structures are repeats that provide the readers with a fun opportunity to take in and comprehend thoughts, facts, and concepts.
Due to the way it exploits word patterns and connects them to one another, parallel structure improves readability and fosters writing fluency.
It gives the appearance of sophisticated language, particularly in literature and advertising. Parallel structures also synchronize, repeat, and stress the writers' words and ideas.
Check out the link below to learn more about parallel structure;
brainly.com/question/12906578
#SPJ1
In the excerpt from Thunberg's speech, she moves from a general premise about CO2 usage to a specific prediction about emissions, as explained below.
<h3>What is Thunberg's reasoning?</h3>
This question concerns the ending of the speech given by Greta Thunberg at the United Nations. Thunberg mentions the following:
- We can still have a 67% chance to stay below a 1.5 degrees global temperature rise.
- To accomplish that, back in 2018, we had 420 gigatons of CO2 left to emit.
- However, that figure is already down to less than 350 gigatons.
- In conclusion, our CO2 budget will be over in just 8 and a half years.
We can see that Thunberg goes from a general premise to a specific prediction about emissions. The premise consists of everything she says about the amount of CO2 we are allowed to emit. The prediction is that we will use up that amount in just 8 years.
With the information above in mind, we can select option B as the correct answer concerning Thunberg's reasoning. She moves from a general premise about CO2 usage to a specific prediction about emissions.
The missing excerpt is the following:
"To have a 67% chance of staying below a 1.5 degrees global temperature rise – the best odds given by the [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] – the world had 420 gigatons of CO2 left to emit back on Jan. 1st, 2018. Today that figure is already down to less than 350 gigatons.
"How dare you pretend that this can be solved with just 'business as usual' and some technical solutions? With today's emissions levels, that remaining CO2 budget will be entirely gone within less than 8 1/2 years."
Learn more about Greta Thunberg here:
brainly.com/question/28419470
#SPJ1
Answer:
Famine in this sentance means a shortage of food
