1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tangare [24]
4 years ago
10

Identify the sentence using the indicated pronoun correctly. whom as an interrogative pronoun Whom did you forget to call? Whom

is your friend?
English
2 answers:
nordsb [41]4 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The sentence that uses <em>whom</em> correctly is "Whom did you forget to call?"

Explanation:

"Whom" should be used to refer to the object of a verb or preposition. In order to be sure as regards when to use who or whom, you can do a test. If you can replace the word with "he" or "she", you should use "who". If you can replace it with "him" or "her", use "whom". "Who" is not used to refer to the object of a verb or preposition but to the subject.

In this case, "whom" functions as the object of the verb.

likoan [24]4 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is:  Whom did you forget to call?

You might be interested in
How does hale contribute to the emotional fever of the end of the act, when the girls begin naming individuals who were seen wit
Strike441 [17]

<span>Hale contributes to the emotional fever of the end of the act by praising God when the girls start taking names of those who were seen with the Devil. He originally asked Tituba for all the names, but when t</span><span>he other girls joined in he becomes more excited. He also says that the people who are named as<span> keeping the company with Devil will be penalized, this could encourage the girls to name more people they do not like.</span></span>

8 0
3 years ago
Prompt
Sedaia [141]

Answer:

This is my whole responce please paraphrase  

Explanation:

In Shirley Chisholm’s Speech “People and Peace, Not Profits and War.” Chisholm uses introduction, narration, confirmation, refutation, and conclusion, all of which are effective in her speech to strengthen her argument that the military should not be pouring so much of the government’s money into the Vietnam War. Chisholm also uses ethos, pathos, and logos to strengthen her argument. An excellent example of Confirmation in Chisholm’s speech is the quote, “The new secretary of health, education, and welfare, Robert Finch, came to the Hill, to tell the House Education and Labor Committee that he thinks we should spend more on education, particularly in city schools. But, he said, unfortunately, we cannot “afford” to, until we have reached some kind of good solution to the Vietnam War.” (30) This quote establishes credibility for Chisholm as she uses the opinion of another credible person to help with the argument of how spending money on the war has consequences for American citizens. Another example that Chisholm uses that fit a classical argument is a narrative” I was one of the many Americans who hoped it would mean that our country would benefit from the fresh perspectives, the new ideas, the different priorities of a leader who had no part in the mistakes of the past. Mr. Nixon had said things like this: “If our cities are to be livable for the next generation, we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problems that beset them and to the tensions that tear them apart.” And he said, “When you cut expenditures for education, what you are doing is shortchanging the American future.” (10). Chisholm uses Narration of Nixon’s words and hers to share the dissatisfaction with how Nixon is dealing with the war and the money of America. Her claim is strengthened due to the fact she uses Nixon’s own words against him since Nixon preached many things that he would do, and Chisholm says, “But frankly, I have never cared too much what people say. What I am interested in is what they do.” That statement shows that when Nixon didn't prove his claims together with his actions, Chisholm was quite disappointed. Chisholm's speech does an excellent job of convincing her audience on how we should think of the well-being of Americans and not just war. she uses many rhetorical elements that help her claims.

8 0
3 years ago
Identify the sentence that does not have an understood you as it’s subject
Vinil7 [7]
Edit your answer; include the answer choices wo we can choose the correct sentence
4 0
4 years ago
How to write a full sentence outline.​
Andru [333]

Answer:

This question could mean like 10 different things

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
? Question Read the sentence. If Steve had taken part in the swimming competition, he would have won the gold medal. Why does th
sesenic [268]

Answer: A. To show a possibility of Steve winning the gold medal

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do I end a formal letter to a teacher?
    7·2 answers
  • Which evaluation of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman makes an accurate conclusion about Wollstonecraft’s beliefs and correct
    10·2 answers
  • PLZ HELP BRAIN FAM!
    5·2 answers
  • What are examples of a diamante poem
    6·2 answers
  • What is a hotel boy in a hotel
    15·1 answer
  • Dust of Snow
    15·1 answer
  • What is the suffix in the word Segregation?<br><br> se<br> seg<br> on<br> ation
    9·1 answer
  • Read the beginning of the story.Wriite 10 new seantences to complete the story in a way you would like.
    8·1 answer
  • What do the following excerpts from the novel tell readers about Ashima and Ashoke’s relationship? “Ashima never thinks of her h
    7·1 answer
  • When concluding his speech, Martin says, “And so, I want to encourage each of you to donate the $500 it will take to build a wel
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!