Answer:
D). All of the above.
Explanation:
A eulogy is described as a commemorative speech or oration that is delivered at the demise of a person to recount and honor the achievements of the deceased person.
As per the question, eulogy delivered by James would be considered inappropriate due to the 'all the given reasons' as <u>it is too long which goes monotonous and fails to create the desired impact of honoring the achievements of the deceased person.</u> At the same time, it would most likely <u>offend the women audience due to his sexist claim</u> that 'deceased friend's wife is a terrific spouse because she 'didn't nag like most wives about his drinking' and <u>'bragging the topic of alcohol consumption' is both ethically as well as morally inappropriate</u> to be discussed at a person's funeral. Therefore, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
3rd choice, analysis, makes the most sense
It should not be controversial: it would only make the research less reliable since people would have their opinions about the topic that they would want to defend. It should also not be obscure: then it's hard to check.
The best answer is that it should be multifaceted: it should include a number of aspects, not just one, so that the test can check for those aspects, not just one.
He feels happy but still worried
Answer:
Explanation:D. Zero sentences of opinion
