Answer:
California was the biggest of all new states and likely candidates to enter the Union, though it was not very populated by then. However, its population was rising fast because of the golden rush and significant immigration from the East Coast after 1848.
The Southern states, which allowed and supported slavery, were worried that the incorporation of California as a free state would alter the delicate balance of power between free states and slavery states in Congress and in general. Let´s not forget that slavery was very important to the South because its economy was agricultural and demanded a large labor force to function.
Explanation:
A Samoa it is hard to explain but it is Samoa we are learning all about it in class and it is very hard to explain
Hey there!
<span>Which of the following was NOT a step taken by Louis XIV to change France into a centralized, modern state?
Answer:
</span><span>.He built the most powerful navy in the world.
Hope this helps
Have a great day (:
</span>
Answer:
The best answer is A.
Explanation:
A push factor for immigration is an uncomfortable or poor living condition, which causes people to look for new, better places to live in hopes of a new life.
I don't know if this is a multiple choice question or one answer, but if there is two answers C would be the other choice.
I hope this helps
Answer:
Yes there would be a gain to the United States from importing any of those products from Britain because it only has absolute advantage not comparative advantage.
Explanation:
Absolute advantage in international trade is the ability of a nation to produce more goods with its resources without considering that there might a better alternative to which resources can be deployed that would yield more output compared to its trading partners.
While on the other hand ,comparative advantage is when a country has a lower opportunity costs in producing an item compared to its rival nations.
Which means the country that has comparative advantage is given up less opportunities when producing its desired goods viz-a-viz its competing nations.
In other words,absolute advantage does not guarantee efficiency,only comparative advantage does.
