I’m not sure if i can answer this i’m sorry
Answer: No, it wouldn’t be a work of art.
Explanation: It wouldn’t be a work of Art because the artistic value is lost since the art loses its subjectivity. When the Artist work was allowed to hang in a public space, it had boundaries and was defined by no rules. It was a beautiful fusion of art and design viewed by all. Design and Art is objective; it’s primary function is to express the imagination in non grammatical ways. Those ways are determined by the artists and those that view it.
If this piece of work belonged to a corporation, it would lose its power of reflection and instead the corporation it belonged to would be in charge of allowing the art piece to reflect or convey a new form of visual rhetoric. This new framework would allow the corporation to communicate their own message, idea, or point of view. Which no longer makes it subjective.
Answer:
An critics consider the function of a work of art when they studying it neatly and properly...it's only my opinion,I don't mind if you don't agree..
Answer:
Line. I’m sure we’re all aware of what lines are, but just to be sure, lines can be defined as any linear marks.
Scale. Scale is a large part of design, sometimes literally. ...
Colour. ...
Repetition. ...
Negative Space. ...
Symmetry. ...
Transparency. ...
Texture. ...
Balance. ...
Hierarchy. ...
The Monticello also functions as a private residence. Not only that, design elements popular in late 18th-century Europe were added to it, giving it some differences compared to the classical architecture of Rome and Renaissance Italy.