1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lelechka [254]
4 years ago
12

What is the difference between the british and the clonists

History
2 answers:
ololo11 [35]4 years ago
5 0
The British were those who sent people to the "New World", where those people became colonists.
Luden [163]4 years ago
4 0
The British taxed the colonist for money because they didn't have enough of it.
You might be interested in
John’s bank statement shows a closing balance for a given month as $2,200 and his personal account register shows a closing bala
stich3 [128]

Answer:

I think it would be 1050 because that's what was left in the bank.

Explanation:

i added 200+200+300+450 and got 1150 and minused it by 2050

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The amendment process under the Constitution allows the government to (3 points)
oee [108]
I believe the answer is "change to meet the needs of a modern society".
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
BEST ANSWER GETS BRAINLEIST 20 PTS
AlekseyPX

Hello Bunny Pop! 


Here is your answer


When the United States entered World War I in 1917, Germans were the single largest ethnic group in Minnesota. Nativism during this period was a “patriotic” attitude that saw recent immigrants—particularly those of German descent— as potentially traitorous. Many felt that because German Americans shared their heritage with the Kaiser and the German Empire, they would side with the enemy power. That many German Americans advocated neutrality until the U.S. declared war was further proof of disloyalty to nativists.

The most conspicuous nativist agency was the Minnesota Commission of Public Safety (MCPS). Created by the state legislature in April of 1917, the MCPS was a seven-person commission headed by Governor J. A. A. Burnquist. It was given near-dictatorial powers to support the war effort at home and root out disloyal elements. While much of the commission’s activity focused on attacking labor advocates and political dissenters in the Nonpartisan League and the Industrial Workers of the World, the MCPS kept a close watch on German Americans as well. There was, in fact, much cross-over between these two groups, since many German Americans were both socialists and pacifists.

The MCPS took drastic action in dealing with a gathering in New Ulm on July 25, 1917. The meeting was organized by Brown County Auditor Louis Vogel, Mayor Dr. Louis Fritsche, and city attorney Albert Pfaender. Its agenda was to discuss the constitutionality of the draft. The MCPS and its agents already suspected Pfaender and Fritsche of sedition. A month later, Burnquist had them both deposed.

Another victim of the July 25 rally was Adolph Ackermann, president of Dr. Martin Luther College. During the demonstration, he gave a speech questioning the government’s motive for entering the war. In response to his comments, the MCPS coerced the college to force Ackermann’s resignation.

Nativism sometimes served personal and business interests. After Fritsche was removed from office, the MCPS pressured the State Medical Society and the Brown–Redwood County Society to revoke the ex-mayor’s medical certification. Two doctors on the review panel who voted against Fritsche ran practices in Springfield, a town in keen business competition with New Ulm. Fritsche was eventually exonerated.

Another vested-interest case unfolded in Springfield, where mostly German American stakeholders proposed creating a new bank. The president of the existing State Bank of Springfield submitted the names of those stakeholders to the MCPS to investigate their loyalty.

Some members of the Catholic Church also stood to benefit from anti-German policies. Archbishop John Ireland had long promoted the “Americanization” of the Church. During the war, this attitude gained ground. The archbishop urged that English should be the only language of church liturgy—a move that alienated German Catholics and their clergy, who conducted mass in German. This division allowed many Irish Catholics to assume leadership positions at the expense of their German counterparts.

The German-language press was an obvious target. The MCPS kept a close eye on many of these publications. Albert Steinhauser, publisher of the New Ulm Post and the New Ulm Review, featured many German articles in his papers that criticized the war. Under pressure from the commission, he was arrested and expelled from the Minnesota State Editorial Association in 1918. Even more severe, federal authorities jailed Volkszeitung editor Frederick W. Bergmeier of St. Paul for the duration of the war.

German Minnesotans responded to nativism in different ways. While many spoke their minds and suffered, others kept quiet and out of sight. Some became vehement and vocal “patriots” or “100% Americans” in order to deflect suspicion. A few even spied on other Germans for the MCPS. The replacements for both Fritsche and Pfaender were themselves German Americans. Bishop Busch, the stalwart “Americanizer,” was of Austrian stock.

The MCPS and other officials both represented and sanctioned a general culture of fear and hostility against German Americans. Such antagonism manifested itself throughout society at large. Indeed, many of the investigations conducted by the commission were petitioned by private citizens. This created a climate of paranoia and violence. Fritsche and his family, after his disgrace, lived in fear of their well-being and lives; this was by no means unusual for victims of nativism. Nativist Minnesotans boycotted their German neighbors’ stores, vandalized their property, and called for them to resign from their jobs.

When World War I ended, so did much of the MCPS’s justification. It was abolished by legislative act in 1919 and met for the last time in 1920. With the commission’s demise and the end of the war, anti-German nativism lost much of its momentum.


Hope this helps and answers your question. I wish you the best of luck! :) 

6 0
4 years ago
Please help! this is due today!
juin [17]

Answer:

I mean, in order to set up, prepare and plan to kill. you would,be pretty evil

5 0
3 years ago
Three famous artists during the renaissance were __?
san4es73 [151]

Three famous artists during the renaissance were as follows:

1. Michelangelo - was an Italian born artist of the High Renaissance in the Republic of Florence.

2. Raphael - also Italian, mastered painting and architect.

3. Leonardo da Vinci - is best known for his painting of the Mona Lisa

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The North’s blockade of the Southern sea ports was challenged in an early battle at sea between which two iron-clad vessels?
    7·2 answers
  • What were two of the considerations needing to be addressed when thinking about how Reconstruction would be carried out?
    10·1 answer
  • This poster was displayed at factories that produced war materials. Why are the Japanese portrayed in this way?
    15·2 answers
  • White Americans willing to contemplate an end to bondage almost always coupled calls for abolition with the colonization of free
    8·1 answer
  • The importation of slaves into southern Carolina started because planters needed labor to grow what crop?
    14·1 answer
  • Amendment 5 protects people from being charged twice for the same crime. this is called what?
    11·1 answer
  • Where did the American colonizing society want to send former slaves and free blacks to?
    6·2 answers
  • Why did patroclus wear the armor of Achilles
    8·2 answers
  • 1. Mahalaga ang papel ng mga kabalyero sa sistemang piyudal dahil sila ang gumaganap ng gawaing
    11·1 answer
  • Match each description to its corresponding civilization
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!