1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lelechka [254]
4 years ago
12

What is the difference between the british and the clonists

History
2 answers:
ololo11 [35]4 years ago
5 0
The British were those who sent people to the "New World", where those people became colonists.
Luden [163]4 years ago
4 0
The British taxed the colonist for money because they didn't have enough of it.
You might be interested in
Through the years, several plans have been suggested to _____.
Vitek1552 [10]
Reform the electoral college system
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does a republic differ from the colonial form of government experience before the American revolution?
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Prior to the Revolutionary War, the US experienced a colonial form of government, which differs from a Republic in several significant ways:

  • A colony is ruled by a foreign power. In the case of the US, this power was England. A republic, on the other hand, is autonomous, and it forms its own government.
  • A colony is usually ruled by a monarch (it is not a necessary requirement, but it has been so in practice), while republics elect their leader through voting.  
  • Republics tend to be democratic and participatory, with no inherited power positions.
  • A republic has the power to make its own laws in terms of taxation, rights and duties, education, healthcare, etc. while the colony has to follow those of the mother country.
  • Republics tend to have their own constitution.
4 0
3 years ago
What did Saddam Hussein do to the kurds
-Dominant- [34]
He commanded an attack where he committed mass genocide in 2001. this led to u.s. getting involved because they saw the rise of a modern day hittler.
3 0
3 years ago
Explain ONE way that, despite economic change, traditional elites remained powerful in the period 1750–1900.
valkas [14]

Answer:

Many traditional elites remained powerful in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries because they used their wealth to engage or invest in industrial capitalism. Native elites in colonial territories often remained powerful by making agreements with European powers to retain their positions, privileges, and wealth.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How did the english empire in america expand in the mid-seventeenth century?
Nezavi [6.7K]
<span>Seventeenth-century North America was an unstable and dangerous environment. Diseases decimated Indian and settler populations alike. Colonies were racked by religious, political, and economic tensions and drawn into imperial wars and conflict with Indians. They remained dependent on the mother country for protection and economic assistance</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What challenge did American farmers face in the late 1920s?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the Indus valley civilization known for?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a Hebrew belief. A. God does not have moral expectations for people. B. God is fair and just and cares
    12·2 answers
  • Followed the Warring States Period
    8·1 answer
  • In terms of per capita government spending, texas
    5·1 answer
  • How did African-American culture developed in cities in the south
    15·1 answer
  • Al Smith was accused of stealing a television set and arrested. The police told Al that witnesses saw him take the television se
    7·2 answers
  • What is Confucianism?????
    12·2 answers
  • How did President Roosevelt bypass the Neutrality Acts after Japan's invasion of China in 1937?
    10·1 answer
  • Should we accept refugees from all countries without verifying why they are coming to America?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!