1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ivahew [28]
3 years ago
13

which quotation form the federalist papers is most clearly a response to the anti-federalist argument that the constitution need

s to be changed to include a bill of rights
History
1 answer:
sergey [27]3 years ago
3 0

You did not include quotation options, but here is the section from Federalist Papers, #84, which addresses the inclusion of a Bill of Rights:

<em>There remains but one other view of this matter to conclude the point. The truth is, after all the declamations we have heard, that the Constitution is itself, in every rational sense, and to every useful purpose, A BILL OF RIGHTS. The several bills of rights in Great Britain form its Constitution, and conversely the constitution of each State is its bill of rights. And the proposed Constitution, if adopted, will be the bill of rights of the Union. Is it one object of a bill of rights to declare and specify the political privileges of the citizens in the structure and administration of the government? This is done in the most ample and precise manner in the plan of the convention; comprehending various precautions for the public security, which are not to be found in any of the State constitutions. Is another object of a bill of rights to define certain immunities and modes of proceeding, which are relative to personal and private concerns? This we have seen has also been attended to, in a variety of cases, in the same plan. Adverting therefore to the substantial meaning of a bill of rights, it is absurd to allege that it is not to be found in the work of the convention. It may be said that it does not go far enough, though it will not be easy to make this appear; but it can with no propriety be contended that there is no such thing. It certainly must be immaterial what mode is observed as to the order of declaring the rights of the citizens, if they are to be found in any part of the instrument which establishes the government. And hence it must be apparent, that much of what has been said on this subject rests merely on verbal and nominal distinctions, entirely foreign from the substance of the thing.</em>

You might be interested in
The Battle of Midway was a ____ point in the war.
aleksklad [387]
D: Turning point. The Japanese lost 322 aircrafts and most of their navy fleet.
6 0
3 years ago
What was the main purpose of the Fredonian Rebellion?
dsp73

Answer:

It was the first attempt by Anglo settlers in Texas to secede from Mexico. The settlers, led by Empresario Haden Edwards, declared independence from Mexican Texas and created the Republic of Fredonia near Nacogdoches.

(A) is the correct answer

3 0
2 years ago
Greek civilization began along the ____.
anastassius [24]

Answer:  Aegean Sea

Explanation: Greek civilization first settled near the Aegean sea. So it will be Greek civilization began along the Aegean Sea.

8 0
3 years ago
A ton more points be like
iogann1982 [59]

Answer:

THANKS <3333

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How could a dispute between the Tripe alliance and the Triple entente draw all of Europe into the conflict?
dlinn [17]
It's important to know the difference between an alliance and an entente in order to answer this question.
alliance means that when one enters a war, every ally of that country enters as well.  entente means that when one enters a war, others are not required to.
the Triple Alliance meant that once war started for Austria-Hungary, war also began for the Allied German States and Italy.
however, although Serbia (where the Alliance was attacking) was "friends" with the entente, it was not a member of the Triple Entente--and because as an entente they were not required to fight for one another anyway--it was up to France, Britain, and Russia had the option to join or not.
but all ended up joining because, to put it jokingly, "their friends are fighting our friends!"
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is not a power of the president?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the Virginia house of burgesses?
    8·1 answer
  • Gran Colombia was an example of a
    14·1 answer
  • People who sought “normalization” for individuals with mental illnesses wanted to
    5·1 answer
  • In command economy what are many basic needs provided by
    12·1 answer
  • What kind of people would have been part of the Progressive party?
    14·1 answer
  • Please Help!!
    11·1 answer
  • What is correct about John Monroe
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is FALSE?
    12·2 answers
  • 2. What early communal system did John Smith abolish at Jamestown, saving her
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!