Answer:
B. to force Parliament to repeal the Townshend Acts.
Explanation:
The Boston non-importation agreement was an agreement signed by merchants and traders on August 1, 1768. The agreement was a collective decision of some sixty merchants and traders of Boston who agreed not to import any goods or export any items to Britain.
The purpose of the agreement was to force the British Parliament to repeal the Townshend Acts. The Townshend Acts of 1767, were a series of acts enacted by the British Parliament to exert their authority over the American colonies by imposing taxes to raise revenues.
The agreement was an act by the Boston colony to force the British Parliament to remove the Townshend Acts.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Answer:
The answer is associated with B. but the answer is A!!!.
Explanation:
The Munich Conference was a meeting with the Prime Minister of Great Britian, Neville Chamberlain and Hitler that would have peace terms between Britian and Nazi Germany that would prevent a Second World War which in the end it didn't.
The ruling determined that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional.
In doing so, the Supreme Court asserted that it has the right to declare laws of Congress unconstitutional.
It was sort of a roundabout way in which the principle of judicial review was asserted by the Supreme Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison. William Marbury had been appointed Justice of the Peace for the District of Columbia by outgoing president John Adams -- one of a number of such last-minute appointments made by Adams. When Thomas Jefferson came into office as president, he directed his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver many of the commission papers for appointees such as Marbury. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court directly to hear his case, as a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 had made possible. The Court said that particular provision of the Judiciary Act was in conflict with Article III of the Constitution, and so they could not issue a specific ruling in Marbury's case (which they believe he should have won). But the bottom line was, the Court had taken up the right of judicial review by calling out a portion of the Judiciary Act of 1789 as unconstitutional.
The axis invaded most of Europe<span />
