Musician. The griot is a repository of <span>oral tradition and is often seen as a societal leader due to his traditional position as an adviser to royal personages. As a result of the former of these two functions, he is sometimes also called a bard</span><span>. According to Paul Oliver in his book </span>Savannah Syncopators, "Though [the griot] has to know many traditional songs without error, he must also have the ability to extemporize on current events, chance incidents and the passing scene. His wit can be devastating and his knowledge of local history formidable". Although they are popularly known as "praise singers", griots may use their vocal expertise for gossip, satire, or political comment.
Answer:
The correct answer is B: <u>It has become wealthier, more cultured, and more frivolous in its spending habits.</u>
Explanation:
The United States<u> </u><u>is a country in constant growth</u>. All this, is due to its stable economy, the purchasing power and the excellent quality of life that its habitants enjoy, which also demonstrates that <u>it is an increasingly wealthier nation</u>. On the other hand, the tremendously varied demography that has always characterized American society <u>ended up with an enriched culture</u>, continuous development and constant improvement and change (generally positive). In addition, <u>all this development, comforts and high life quality allows them to be frivolous when it comes to spending.</u> Spending in this can be negative when it affects others (or the environment) or positive if it is simply about making each individual feel comfortable. <u>In conclusion, the American population is richer, culturally developed and more comfortable when it comes to spending.
</u>
The statement is TRUE.
The Ethics Reform Act of 1989, guaranteed automatic cost of living adjusments (known as "COLAs") to protect the salaries of judges against inflation. This also applied to other areas of federal employment. Pay raises, however, could be denied if the President declared national emergency or some serious economic crisis were to generate a collapse.
Despite these promises, Congress refused on several occasions throughout the past decades to raise judges' salaries, even on occasions where other federal employees were benefited by COLAs.
This led to a series of court fights that culminated with the authority given to Congress to take away promised pay raises from judges any time before they'd taken formal effect. What this means is that the Constitution will only protect judges’ pay that has been “due and payable". The review of this ruling was denied by the Supreme Court for several years. However, Congress did end up voting to allow an increment of pay for judges later on (but not in 2007 or 2010, to cite some more examples of recent denials).
Hope this helps!
Answer:
you already picked the other guy as brainiest so I'm just answering for points
Explanation:
