Answer:
The opening text to EVEREST explains the difficulty of climbing Mt. Everest but then talks about how expeditions are set up to held people reach the summit. This film tells the true story of one such expedition in 1996 where the climbers ran into a disastrous storm with tragic results.
EVEREST is a very grim, depressing and rather unpleasant movie that I really wish was better. I had high hopes going into the film but sadly there are all sorts of problems that overshadow what great qualities that are on display. I think the biggest problem is the opening hour where we get to know the characters and like a lot of the disaster movies from the 1970s these scenes are all too familiar and they really don't add much. I think the direction of Baltasar Kormakur could have handled these scenes much better or at least added a bit of energy to them.
The film kicks into high gear once the climb actually starts and once the storm hits. The greatest aspect to the film is the terrific cinematography, which is just downright beautiful and at times breath-taking. Even greater is the fact that it really does show you the dangers of making such a climb and I think the one thing the film does brilliantly is show you what a remarkable accomplishment it would be to reach the top of the mountain. I've seen several documentaries on Everest but this movie really does a remarkable job at showing how difficult the climb would be.
The performances are all very good. Jason Clarke, Jake Gyllenhaal, Emily Watson, Keira Knightley and Josh Brolin are all very good in their roles. All of the roles are rather small but it's easy to see what would attract them to such a project. The film also benefits from being technically very good with the score, the editing, sound effects and various other effects coming across quite good.
As I said, the first hour of the film is rather sluggish and I think the overall pacing is just off. The film features some intense scenes of action and peril but as I said the overall feel is just so depressing and unpleasant that I really wouldn't recommend the movie to people. I really wish the film was better but in the end it falls well short of being a good movie.
Explanation:
1. Bush v. Gore
2. Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
3. Tinker v. Does Moines
4. Miranda v. Arizona
5. Gideon v. Wainwright
6. Brown v. Board of education
7. Please v. Ferguson
8. Marburg v. Madison
9. United States v. Nixon
3. The characters are presented in new or unusual ways.
Answer:
it's a type of frame thing for an image. i will try to describe it: the edges of the image fade instead of it being rectilinear.
example of vignette frame
notice how the image fades into the edges
The correct arrangement of the events chronologically in <em>To Build a Fire</em> is:
- The man is given advice and a warning by the old timer about travelling alone in such low temperatures.
- The man continues his journey up the left fork.
- He arrives at the fork.
- The man heads up the trail with the dog with only light supplies.
- The man's foot goes through the ice and he is wet.
- The dog puts its foot through the ice.
- Now increasingly aware of the cold, the man lights a fire and eats his sandwich.
- The fire is put out by snowfall from the tree above.
- With great difficulty, he lights another fire.
- The man tries to kill the dog.
- The dog leaves.
- The man freezes to death.
<h3>What is a sequence of events?</h3>
This is known to be the order in which events take place in a story.
Hence, we can the chronological order in which the story is told reveals the journey of the man with his dog, building a fire, and the sad turn of events which led to the death of the man due to the cold temperature.
Read more about <em>sequence of events </em>here:
brainly.com/question/1620200
#SPJ1
