1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
exis [7]
2 years ago
10

How were the Zulu resistance in Southern Africa and the Boxer Rebellion in China similar?

History
1 answer:
Lubov Fominskaja [6]2 years ago
5 0
Both groups had somewhat similar goals of independence from the government. The Zulu expanded their claims of land throughout of South Africa which fueled a conflict between them and the British ggovernment.

On the other hand, the Chinese Boxers increase their strength by invading lands iin parts of North China of which had alarmed the government and thought of them as rebels. 

<span>The Zulu's were defeated by mainly by technological resources used by the British while the Boxers anitforeign forces won over them and had forced them to drop the opposition.</span>
You might be interested in
What is the federalist papers supported the passage of the u.S. Constitution ?
DaniilM [7]

Answer:

Federalist Papers to help people to understand the US Constitution.

Explanation:

There are 85 essays in Federalist Papers which were printed in New York newspapers while New York State was deciding whether or not to support the U.S. Constitution. These are a series of eighty-five letters written to newspapers in 1787-1788 by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, urging ratification of the Constitution Other newspapers outside New York also published the essays as other states were deciding to ratify the Constitution. In 1788, the papers were published together in a book called The Federalist.  As of today, the people still read the Federalist Papers to help them understand the Constitution.

Hamilton, who wrote about two-thirds of the essays has addressed the objections of opponents, who feared a tyrannical central government that would supersede states’ rights and encroach on individual liberties. All strong nationalists, the essayists argued that, most important, the proposed system would preserve the Union, now in danger of breaking apart, and empower the federal government to act firmly and coherently in the national interest. Conflicting economic and political interests would be reconciled through a representative Congress, whose legislation would be subject to presidential veto and judicial review.

4 0
2 years ago
How did the Chavin display their gods?
dmitriy555 [2]

Answer:

its c

Explanation:

in the lesson there was a picture of a sculpture of one of their "gods" and the

guy said it was stone

soooooooo the answer is c

8 0
3 years ago
What were the values of the middle class? How did they differ from the values of those above and below them on the socioeconomic
masha68 [24]

The creation of distinctive classes in the North drove striking new cultural developments. Even among the wealthy elites, northern business families, who had mainly inherited their money, distanced themselves from the newly wealthy manufacturing leaders. Regardless of how they had earned their money, however, the elite lived and socialized apart from members of the growing middle class. The middle class valued work, consumption, and education and dedicated their energies to maintaining or advancing their social status. Wage workers formed their own society in industrial cities and mill villages, though lack of money and long working hours effectively prevented the working class from consuming the fruits of their labor, educating their children, or advancing up the economic ladder.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does anyone have tips on making an online world history class more interesting? I’m having a very hard time.
Deffense [45]

Answer:

Get more into real life situations. For example something that will make this decade more interested. Instead of something for 1875 that everyone will get bored of.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Why was Rome a good site for a city? Choose all answers that are correct. Rome had an ideal seaport. The climate of Rome was goo
IgorC [24]

Rome had an ideal seaport.

Rome was built on seven hills, which offered natural protection from invaders.

The climate of Rome was good for growing a variety of crops.

Answer: Options 1, 2 and 3.

<u>Explanation:</u>

For a city to develop, certain factors are to be kept n mind before the city develops. It includes easy accessibility to the people of that city with other cities either through land or through sea. It should not be very easily invaded by invaders.

Moreover the climate of the city should be appropriate for growing crops and doing agriculture in the city so that the farmers can grow food for other people. All these things were available in Rome, therefore making it a good site for a city.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How was the question of slave labor in America primarily seen in the 1850s? as a moral question as a question of property rights
    6·2 answers
  • What were the political consequences of the revolution religion during the mid 1700s
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following were typical of society under John Calvin’s leadership in Geneva? Select all that apply:
    9·1 answer
  • Which two geographic features are connected by the Ohio River?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the division of labor lead to the development of trade?
    12·1 answer
  • The invention of labor-saving devices for the farmer was called the:
    8·2 answers
  • How did the ideas of renisance influence art and education ? please help
    7·1 answer
  • 6.06 war on the bank- Step One
    15·1 answer
  • Those who herd flocks and do not settle in one place are called<br><br> Provide evidence
    10·1 answer
  • 1. In 1900, what area were most foreign-born Americans from?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!