B and C
The Mayans were polytheistic (worshiped multiple deities) so A is incorrect.
They had their own form of hieroglyphics so B is correct.
The practice of astrology was one of the most important aspects of Mayan culture, and they supplemented their knowledge of the stars using math to figure out complex patterns so C is correct.
It was the Incas, NOT the Mayans who had runners, so D is incorrect.
The war between the U.S and mexico took place because the U.S decide they wanted to expand across the North American continent, which caused them to clash with all of it's neighbors including the british, the Mexicans and the Native Americans. Americans began migrating to the west even into land that did not belong to the United States.When Plok came into Office in 1845, he believed in the idea of "Manifest Destiny" hwich was the belief that expanding the U.S throughout the continents was both lawful and necessary.
Byzantine citizens considered themselves Romans - find out why. In this empire, the rites, beliefs, & theology of traditional Christianity was fashioned. Sign Up For Newsletters. View Events. World-leading scholars. Independent fellowship.
Answer:
I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.
Explanation:
Answer:
The New England states did not support the war. They feared a land invasion and refused to place their militias under federal control. The Hartford Convention resulted in a declaration calling on the Federal Government to protect New England and to supply financial aid to New England's badly battered trade economy.
Explanation:
