Answer:
B
Explanation:
It's B because B supports why the shoes could be made badly (in this case, the glue doesn't work well).
Political Parties Splinter: The issue of slavery split the Democratic Party in two in 1860.
The Election of 1860: Slavery was the main issue and Lincoln wanted to ban it in all new territories, and since the north had a bigger population than the South Lincoln had the most votes and won.
Southern States secede: Before Lincoln took office, seven states left the Union. The Confederate States of America chose Jefferson Davis as their president, and the right to slaves was allowed in their Constitution
Efforts at Compromise Fail: When he took office, Lincoln tried to save the Union without war.
First Shots at Fort Sumter: Lincoln calls South Carolina to tell that he is going to send ships there to supply the fort.
Lincoln Calls out the Militia: Lincoln asked the Union states to provide 75,000 militiamen. Slave States who were still in the Union got mad and some left. This is where the Civil War started to kick off.
Hope this helps, have a blessed day! :-)
Answer:
The First Battle of Bull Run, also known as the Battle of Manassas, marked the first major land battle of the American Civil War. ... The engagement began when about 35,000 Union troops marched from the federal capital in Washington, D.C. to strike a Confederate force of 20,000 along a small river known as Bull Run.The South wanted to just keep pushing through the war until the idea of war became unpopular in the North and gave up. What did both sides learn from the Battle of Bull Run? Both sides learned that the war was going to be long and bloody and that their soldiers needed training.
Explanation:
The statement that best describes the outcome of the Persian Wars is “The Greeks were able to stop a Persian invasion, and the Persian Empire stopped trying to conquer Greece.” The problem that led to the start of the Persian Wars was that Persia wanted to punish Athens for the Lomian revolt.
As the periodic bloodshed continues in the Middle East, the search for
an equitable solution must come to grips with the root cause of the
conflict. The conventional wisdom is that, even if both sides are at
fault, the Palestinians are irrational “terrorists” who have no point of
view worth listening to. Our position, however, is that the
Palestinians have a real grievance: their homeland for over a thousand
years was taken, without their consent and mostly by force, during the
creation of the state of Israel. And all subsequent crimes — on both
sides — inevitably follow from this original injustice.
