The author's purpose in both Patrick Henry’s speech and Thomas Paine's common sense is discussed below.
<h3>What distinguishes Patrick Henry from Thomas Paine?</h3>
Thomas Paine employed a sardonic, formal tone, whereas Patrick Henry used a furious, yet emotional tone. But in the end, Patrick Henry's delivery worked better at persuading American colonists to support independence.
The best course of action is to PERSUADE THE COLONISTS TO RESIST the BRITISH RULE.
When the British were in charge of the colonies, these two authors published their writings. The main goal of the writings of these two authors is to persuade the colonists that refusing to rebel against the oppressive British authority serves no useful purpose and that doing so is the only option for them to achieve independence.
Learn more about Patrick Henry from Thomas Paine here:
brainly.com/question/16576227
#SPJ1
Answer:
the first sentence (i.e. If you are hungry,eat a piece of fruit.
Explanation:
Because it has both if clause and main clause.
Answer:
The definition of a rebellion is a resistance against something, particularly the government, authority or other controlling forces do an example of a rebellion is a refusal by a large group of people to follow a law.
Explanation:
Answer:
No, because evidence of the beliefs or opinions of a witness on matters of religion is not admissible to impair credibility.
Explanation:
In this context, credibility is only attained by an oath sworn with lawfully certified objects or items representing the religious beliefs of the state and not necessarily the genuine or validity of the witness declaration with such religious object to swore against the declaration of truth in the court of law.
Answer:
idn :(( I am not smart
Explanation:
I tried it out for an hour still couldn't find it :(
