One can evoke the Universal Declaration of Humans, articles 9 and 10 assert the right of fair judgment and one can add that it is based on the simple fact that all of us want fair treatment and not arbritary justice.
On the other hand, maybe to save the lives of thousands of people, sometimes it wouldbe necessary strong coersion to get vital intel on the location of a dangerous leader or weapons of mass destruction.
Battle of Fort Albany – French forces engage and defeat British relief forces in Hudson Bay. 1689 Battle of Bantry Bay – France defeats the English
Despite the declaration's<span> symbolic significance, however, it </span>would<span> be .... laws above mentioned, and because </span>women do feel<span> themselves aggrieved, ... This assertion underscored the </span>point<span> that, rather than being all-inclusive, the ... The </span>Declaration<span> of </span>Sentiments<span> sought to illustrate this discrepancy in the earlier </span>document<span> and ...</span>
In my own opinion I believe the answer is B, due to the fact that you can see what she had went through, through her writing.
<span>For starters, technology developed and now a lot more people could hear these adresses and see them on TV and hear them through the radio and they could be recorded and studied. The Supreme court decisions were important because they decided what would happen to people and their rights. For example, the supreme court first decided that separate but equal was a good doctrine, but later they decided it was unconstitutional. The addresses could affect public opinion to support something that the congress didn't want, and the supreme court would act on behalf of the people.</span>
