1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rjkz [21]
3 years ago
9

Which of the following statements was not an argument against the

History
1 answer:
Flauer [41]3 years ago
5 0
Generally speaking, it would be "(B) The law violated the Dred Scott decision," that was not an argument against the <span>Fugitive Slave Act, since the Dred Scott Decision somewhat enforced the Act by making it harder for African Americans to sure for their freedom. </span>
You might be interested in
7) What economic effect did World War I have on Plains Wheat farmers? Explain.
liberstina [14]

Answer:7) europe had high demands for wheat which gave american farmers opportunity to sell plenty and raised the value of the crop.

8) poverty that led the poor agriculture techniques, extremely high tempatures, long periods of drought and wing erosions.

9) by 1940s 2.5 million people had moved out of the plain states . of those 200,000 moved to california

6 0
3 years ago
If you haven’t been stopped by the police what do you think your reaction would be? Why do you think you would react this way?
sasho [114]

No i havent been stopped by the police but i think my reaction would be really scared and nervous because i have never been stopped by the police so it would have been new for me

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was crossing rivers dangerous for the pioneers on the oregon trail
Travka [436]

Answer:

Crossing rivers were probably the most dangerous thing pioneers did. Swollen rivers could tip over and drown both people and oxen. Such accidents could cause the loss of life and most or all of valuable supplies. Animals could panic when wading through deep, swift water, causing wagons to overturn.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How was the election of 1912 different from previous presidential elections?
Lina20 [59]
Before the election of 1912, there were actually two major parties that fought the elections. There were also a few small parties in thiose elections that were quiet insignificant. before the 1912 elections, the Republican party split into two parts and one of the section named it the Progressive party. They both carried certain amount of votes. This splitting actually helped the Democrats. Although at that time the Democrats did not have any chance of winning the presidential elections, but the splitting of the Republican Party helped them to win the election of 1912.
5 0
3 years ago
What did you include in your response? Check any that apply.
Anna11 [10]

Hi there!

If you are on E2020, you can select all of the options!

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Look at some photographs of mt evrest in your textbook/internet. What are some interesting differences about mt evrest? List the
    8·1 answer
  • Ne Win staged a military coup that created a military-controlled, one-party system in Burma in 1948. 1960. 1962. 1990.
    11·2 answers
  • What does the U.S. Constitution give the president the exclusive power to do?
    13·2 answers
  • The victory in which battle convinced the French to join the war on the side of the Americans?
    13·2 answers
  • Guatemalan leader Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán:
    13·2 answers
  • What enlightenment policy did the Albany plan union most support?
    8·1 answer
  • Describe one reform that the National Assembly enacted through each of the following documents:
    13·1 answer
  • The dipole moment of hbr is 0.80d. what is the dipole moment of hbr in c⋅m?
    14·1 answer
  • Use the information in the list to answer the question.
    7·1 answer
  • Who was the first black poet to speak at a presidential inauguration?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!