Answer:
I think thats just a software issue. i have the same problem
Explanation:
The digital libraries address the problem of digital exclusion by: They reach out to people who need technology and help teach them digital literacy skills.
<h3>What does it mean to be digitally excluded?</h3>
The digital exclusion is known to be also as digital divide and this is known to be where a part of the population is known to possess a continuous and unequal access and capacity in regards to the use Information and Communications Technologies (ICT),
Note that IT are very essential for all to be fully participated in the society and the digital libraries address the problem of digital exclusion by: They reach out to people who need technology and help teach them digital literacy skills.
Learn more about digital exclusion from
brainly.com/question/7478471
#SPJ1
Since both arrays are already sorted, that means that the first int of one of the arrays will be smaller than all the ints that come after it in the same array. We also know that if the first int of arr1 is smaller than the first int of arr2, then by the same logic, the first int of arr1 is smaller than all the ints in arr2 since arr2 is also sorted.
public static int[] merge(int[] arr1, int[] arr2) {
int i = 0; //current index of arr1
int j = 0; //current index of arr2
int[] result = new int[arr1.length+arr2.length]
while(i < arr1.length && j < arr2.length) {
result[i+j] = Math.min(arr1[i], arr2[j]);
if(arr1[i] < arr2[j]) {
i++;
} else {
j++;
}
}
boolean isArr1 = i+1 < arr1.length;
for(int index = isArr1 ? i : j; index < isArr1 ? arr1.length : arr2.length; index++) {
result[i+j+index] = isArr1 ? arr1[index] : arr2[index]
}
return result;
}
So this implementation is kind of confusing, but it's the first way I thought to do it so I ran with it. There is probably an easier way, but that's the beauty of programming.
A quick explanation:
We first loop through the arrays comparing the first elements of each array, adding whichever is the smallest to the result array. Each time we do so, we increment the index value (i or j) for the array that had the smaller number. Now the next time we are comparing the NEXT element in that array to the PREVIOUS element of the other array. We do this until we reach the end of either arr1 or arr2 so that we don't get an out of bounds exception.
The second step in our method is to tack on the remaining integers to the resulting array. We need to do this because when we reach the end of one array, there will still be at least one more integer in the other array. The boolean isArr1 is telling us whether arr1 is the array with leftovers. If so, we loop through the remaining indices of arr1 and add them to the result. Otherwise, we do the same for arr2. All of this is done using ternary operations to determine which array to use, but if we wanted to we could split the code into two for loops using an if statement.
Answer:
We can periodically take a snapshot of the Domain Name System (DNS) caches in the local Domain Name System (DNS) servers.
Explanation:
We can periodically take a snapshot of the Domain Name System (DNS) caches in the local Domain Name System (DNS) servers. The Web server that appears most frequently in the Domain Name System (DNS) caches is the most popular server. This is because if more users are interested in a Web server, then Domain Name System (DNS) requests for that server are more frequently sent by users. Thus, that Web server will appear in the Domain Name System (DNS) caches more frequently.
