Based on the fact that different states were involved, the matter can be heard b) both in federal court and in state court.
<h3>Jurisdiction of the case </h3>
- Texas has jurisdiction because the incident happened in Texas.
- Oklahoma might have jurisdiction because the vendor is from Oklahoma.
- The federal government also has jurisdiction because the matter involves two states and a workplace injury.
You are therefore free to pursue the matter at both federal and state level which makes option B correct.
Find out more on federal jurisdictions at brainly.com/question/3629164.
The correct answer is true.
Answer:
a. 0.8
b. 5
c. 0.9 and 10
Explanation:
a. The formula to compute the MPC is shown below:
= (Change in consumption) ÷ (Change in investment income)
= $16 billion ÷ $20 billion
= 0.8
b. The formula to compute the size of the multiplier is shown below:
= 1 ÷ (1 - MPC)
= 1 ÷ (1 - 0.8)
= 1 ÷ 0.2
= 5
c. If the change of the consumption increases, then the MPC would be
= (Change in consumption) ÷ (Change in investment income)
= $18 billion ÷ $20 billion
= 0.9
And, the size of the multiplier would be
= 1 ÷ (1 - 0.9)
= 1 ÷ 0.1
= 10
Answer:
Martha made an offer to buy Drake’s home, and he accepted it. Under the terms of the agreement, Martha was supposed to make an earnest money deposit of $10,000, but she only put down $5,000.
Drake accepted the lesser deposit, and the sale was ultimately finalized. This is an example of <u>accepting partial performance</u>
Explanation:
