1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anit [1.1K]
2 years ago
14

In the mid-1500s, John Calvin taught that humans could not change their fate through prayer, faith, or good deeds. This philosop

hy became known as
History
2 answers:
Lorico [155]2 years ago
7 0
In the mid-1500s, John Calvin taught that humans could not change their fate through prayer, faith, or good deeds. This philosophy became known as predestination. 
sveticcg [70]2 years ago
5 0

Answer: PREDESTINATION

Explanation:

John Calvin taught that salvation was entirely by God's grace, but his emphasis was on what that meant to our understanding of God.  He made the key factor all about God's glory.  As summarized by Evangelical Focus, "The real marvel of justification in Calvin’s thought was not that a sinner found himself (herself) pardoned from all iniquity but rather that God was being glorified through the salvation of such a transgressor.  "   So Calvin's emphasis in his teaching regarding salvation was as much about the glory of God as it was about the grace of God.  

Calvin's central emphasis was on the sovereignty of God.   Sovereignty means God is in charge and whatever he determines is final.  This showed itself especially in Calvin's teaching on predestination -- meaning that God decided in advance which persons would be saved and which would not.  Calvin taught that God chose from eternity the persons he would bring to heaven and the persons he would condemn to hell.  He saw this as a testimony to God's sovereign power.  In Calvin's theology, only God has freedom of choice; human beings do not.

You might be interested in
How did colonist in the 1600's provide for their basic needs?<br> please help!!!???
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

When the London Company sent out its first expedition to begin colonizing Virginia on December 20, 1606, it was by no means the first European attempt to exploit North America. In 1564, for example, French Protestants (Huguenots) built a colony near what is now Jacksonville, Florida. This intrusion did not go unnoticed by the Spanish, who had previously claimed the region. The next year, the Spanish established a military post at St. Augustine; Spanish troops soon wiped out the French interlopers residing but 40 miles away.

Meanwhile, Basque, English, and French fishing fleets became regular visitors to the coasts from Newfoundland to Cape Cod. Some of these fishing fleets even set up semi-permanent camps on the coasts to dry their catches and to trade with local Indians, exchanging furs for manufactured goods. For the next two decades, Europeans' presence in North America was limited to these semi-permanent incursions. Then in the 1580s, the English tried to plant a permanent colony on Roanoke Island (on the outer banks of present-day North Carolina), but their effort was short-lived.

In the early 1600s, in rapid succession, the English began a colony (Jamestown) in Chesapeake Bay in 1607, the French built Quebec in 1608, and the Dutch began their interest in the region that became present-day New York. Within another generation, the Plymouth Company (1620), the Massachusetts Bay Company (1629), the Company of New France (1627), and the Dutch West India Company (1621) began to send thousands of colonists, including families, to North America. Successful colonization was not inevitable. Rather, interest in North America was a halting, yet global, contest among European powers to exploit these lands.

There is another very important point to keep in mind:  European colonization and settlement of North America (and other areas of the so-called "new world") was an invasion of territory controlled and settled for centuries by Native Americans. To be sure, Indian control and settlement of that land looked different to European, as compared to Indian, eyes. Nonetheless, Indian groups perceived the Europeans' arrival as an encroachment and they pursued any number of avenues to deal with that invasion. That the Indians were unsuccessful in the long run in resisting or in establishing a more favorable accommodation with the Europeans was as much the result of the impact on Indians of European diseases as superior force of arms. Moreover, to view the situation from Indian perspectives ("facing east from Indian country," in historian Daniel K. Richter's wonderful phrase) is essential in understanding the complex interaction of these very different peoples.

Finally, it is also important to keep in mind that yet a third group of people--in this case Africans--played an active role in the European invasion (or colonization) of the western hemisphere. From the very beginning, Europeans' attempts to establish colonies in the western hemisphere foundered on the lack of laborers to do the hard work of colony-building. The Spanish, for example, enslaved the Indians in regions under their control. The English struck upon the idea of indentured servitude to solve the labor problem in Virginia. Virtually all the European powers eventually turned to African slavery to provide labor on their islands in the West Indies. Slavery was eventually transferred to other colonies in both South and North America.

Because of the interactions of these very diverse peoples, the process of European colonization of the western hemisphere was a complex one, indeed. Individual members of each group confronted situations that were most often not of their own making or choosing. These individuals responded with the means available to them. For most, these means were not sufficient to prevail. Yet these people were not simply victims; they were active agents trying to shape their own destinies. That many of them failed should not detract from their efforts.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Although mining and logging are crucial to the Canadian economy, they also __________.
spayn [35]

Answer:

A. have negative effects on the environment

Explanation:

Although mining is important for the country's economy, the environmental impacts of mining are diverse, ranging from specific local problems to large biological, geomorphological, water and atmospheric changes. Therefore, to know these caused problems and the minimization of their effects is of great necessity to guarantee the preservation of the natural environments.

Extraction of wood also has a negative impact on nature, with the greatest impact being deforestation.   The first consequence of deforestation is the impairment of biodiversity, because of the decrease or even the extinction of plant and animal species. Tropical forests have enormous biodiversity and are therefore priceless. Many species, which are still unknown to the urban-industrial society, may be the cure for diseases and can be used in food or as raw materials. With deforestation, there is a risk that these species will be destroyed before being discovered and studied. In addition, the desmatamente destroys the home of many wild animals that end up going to the urban centers and could cause some inconvenience to the population.

8 0
3 years ago
Why did the South rebel against the Union after Abraham Lincoln was elected president?
SVEN [57.7K]

The Civil War was by far the most catastrophic event to ever happen in the American South. There have been at least a few discussions on whether Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans should have prosecuted the Civil War, but surprisingly very little analysis on whether South Carolina's secession in 1860 was a strategically wise move in the context of the American debate on slavery and states' rights.

Secession was driven by the Southern planter class. For the purposes of this article, let's stipulate that the preservation of slavery and the plantation economy was the primary objective in seceding from the United States. If that was the point of secession, then the strategy was an obvious disaster

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following most contributed to Roosevelt's landslide win in 1932?
Pie
The answer to your question is ! ands 2
6 0
2 years ago
In general, if any branch of trade, or any division of labour, be advantageous to the public, the freer and more general the com
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:" d. Stockholders for a pharmaceuticals company that has a new cancer drug" is the best option from the list because this involves the most free-market operations.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Using the map seen where, which number BEST represents the former location of Fort Screven?
    9·1 answer
  • Please help! How did the role of the Supreme Court change during John Marshall's tenure as chief justice?
    11·2 answers
  • LOTS OF POINTSSSS!!!!!!!! PLS JUST DO THE CHART!!!!!! THANK YOU!! :)
    9·1 answer
  • Please help me i’m struggling
    8·2 answers
  • What were the Punic Wars?
    14·1 answer
  • What new technologies can be used as forces for good as well as for evil?
    5·1 answer
  • O autor do texto considera que a violência foi necessária para se enfrentar um mundo antigo que se defendia ferozmente. Que mund
    10·1 answer
  • in paragrahp 2 truth illustrates her differents strenghts as a women which of these does she not use to prove her point ?
    11·1 answer
  • In the Arab Awakening, democratic uprisings spread through Arab nations. Young activists, who adopted democratic ideals, spearhe
    13·1 answer
  • Which two groups of colonies were industrialized? Middle Colonies, Western Colonies, Southern Colonies, New England Colonies
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!