Answer:
True
Explanation:
The best rooms are always reserved for important people, important and valuable things that wont need much needed attention.
When considering best rooms, you are also considering safety of the room, is it safe enough to be in such room. what qualifies room as the best, is not only the comfort, it is also tied to the safety concerns of the room, when there is fire out break, are there safety measures?/
From a security perspective, the best rooms are directly next to emergency exist. like i stated above, it houses best, important people or things that require safety and security, when there is an attack or robbery for example, to guarantee the safety of such person or item, it needs to be close to an exist door. so yes the statement above is true
These are really bad, but they are something. (the sonnet one is really bad and incomplete)
Haiku:
Without my consent
No soldiers in here
Thanks amendment three
Limerick:
I wont find a solder in my house
Even if he's as quite as a mouse
I will not let him on my tenement
All thanks to the third amendment
Sonnet: (sort of)
James Madison wrote the amendment three.
To quarter soldiers with permission of thee.
But with my consent I will allow it
The pains of war I can't heal I admit
Thanks to James and the amendment of three
A careful reading of the history of the “idea” of family preservation as well as an appraisal of the recent policy context for its adoption—as illuminated by Berry (1997), Schorr (1997), McCroskey and Meezan (1997), and others—suggests that all three explanations—dissensus on values, practice lacunae, and organizational complexities—may to a degree be valid. At a minimum, these and other trenchant commentaries such as those provided recently by Littell and Schuerman (1999) and Halpern (1999) suggest that any discussion of the “practice” of family preservation absent its historical/valuative roots and current organizational and policy context will be incomplete.
That said, this present paper will focus on some of the most vexing challenges of implementing family preservation practice, some of its enduring legacies as a practice modality, and some of the longer range problems in developing practice theory and application that it has illuminated
