<u>Answer:
</u>
The statement can be evaluated by saying that a large lead that was to be chased by the third team before the game ended made them play more and caused a large margin. Here, the association is not causation.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The examination of the statistics done by someone who seems to be one of the players is incorrect.
- It is so because though there is an apparent correlation between two different variables of the study, it has no role to play in the result of the study.
- The lead margin secured by the third team and the overall lead of the teams that played under one coach cannot be said to have influenced each other.
Answer:
Ecological validity
Explanation:
Ecological validity is define as the way in which the findings of a research study are able to be generalized to real life settings.
Owens et al. (2011) manipulating texting while driving conditions (i.e., driving with no texting, driving while texting on a personal phone, driving while texting using an in-vehicle texting system) to see if this influenced visual and steering behaviors of drivers. Participants completed the task by texting the researcher on a closed course. The testing conditions serves as the ecological validity in which the researchers use his finding to generalize it to a real life setting thereby using it to predict the behaviour of the participants in real world settings.
Answer:
sudden and violent shaking of the ground, sometime causing large destructions- from movement of the earth's crust.
Answer: Normative ethics would generally ask what right action is. ... Metaethics, on the other hand, would call into question what it means to say that any action is "correct", whether this type of evaluation is objective or subjective, universal or particular
Explanation :
