Answer:
n = 1 second formula
n = 0 first formula
Step-by-step explanation:
I answer this in the other question you put, here it is again.
This is easy to get. We know the sequence cause it follows a pattern of 8, so let's try some values of n from 1 to 4, to get those numbers with the first formula:
n = 1,2,3,4
f(1) = 8(1) + 2 = 10
f(2) = 8(2) + 2 = 18
f(3) = 8(3) + 2 = 26
f(4) = 8(4) + 2 = 34
As you can see, with the first formula, the first term is 10, and not 2. The only way to get 2 with n = 1 is with the second formula:
f(1) = 8(1) - 6 = 2
f(2) = 8(2) - 6 = 10
f(3) = 8(3) - 6 = 18
f(4) = 8(4) - 6 = 26
With n = 1, the second formula was better and correct.
The first formula could be right only beggining with n = 0. Here is the proof:
f(0) = 8(0) + 2 = 2
26.4 just multiply 6 * 4.4 and that would be the answer!
It is a simple multiplication problem. If you work for 39 hours, and you get paid $8.17 for every hour you work, just multiply 8.17 by 39 to get the gross pay.
8.17 x 39 = 318.63
The gross pay is $318.6.
Hope this helps =)
Standard Form is Ax + By = C
y=2x+5
-2x+y= -2x+2x +5
-2x + y = 5
Answer -2x + y = 5
7 7/8 can be estimated to 8
2 2/11 can be estimated to 2
8 + 2 = 10
7 7/8 = 56+7/8 = 63/8
2 2/11 = 22+2/11 = 24/11
63/8 + 24/11 = 693+192/88 = 10.06
So do you see how similar 10 and 10.06 are to each other? :)
