Answer:
THE COUNTRY SHOULD BE GOOD ENOUGH AND SET AN EXAMPLE FOR THE OTHER COUNTRIES..
THEN THEY WILL BE LIKE A LEADER FOR THE OTHER COUNTRIES
FOR QUESTION 2
Roosevelt described his style of foreign policy as "the exercise of intelligent forethought and of decisive action sufficiently far in advance of any likely crisis." As practiced by Roosevelt, big stick diplomacy had five components. First it was essential to possess serious military capability that would force the adversary to pay close attention. At the time that meant a world-class navy. Roosevelt never had a large army at his disposal. The other qualities were to act justly toward other nations, never to bluff, to strike only when prepared to strike hard, and the willingness to allow the adversary to save face in defeat.
The idea is negotiating peacefully but also having strength in case things go wrong. Simultaneously threatening with the "big stick", or the military, ties in heavily with the idea of Realpolitik, which implies a pursuit of political power that resembles Machiavellian ideals.It is comparable to gunboat diplomacy, as used in international politics by the powers.
Explanation:
HOPE I HELPED
PLS MARK BRAINLIEST
DESPERATELY TRYING TO LEVEL UP
✌ -ZYLYNN JADE ARDENNE
Answer:
but I have to find out if it was just
Explanation:
I don't know
Answer: yes
Explanation: When the colonists where immigrating here from Euprope, was a good thing. Here’s why, when they moved here they [the colonists] made many “establishments” including all of the cities, crops, etc, which made the 13 colonies. Also, the enlightenment thinker such as John Locke, was an English man. And look at all of the many things he has done to our US constitution.
Answer: One of the many differences between the American and French Revolutions is that, unlike the French, Americans did not fight for an abstraction. ... However, the French Revolution was about who should rule at home. They fought for “liberty, equality, and fraternity.”
Explanation:
