Answer:
I believe C would be the correct answer.
Explanation:
D is very easily excluded, the URL path doesn't matter.
A is excluded because the name of your blog doesn't tell you how to present your information to your audience.
B is excluded because I believe bloggers are speaking on their opinions, they're not worried about mainstream media, they're presenting info geared towards their audience.
Keep a copy so you have a record of the communication.
Answer:
<u>Secondary Source</u>
Explanation:
They talk about how they werent there and they could have summarized another piece of writghting(The Primary Source).
Hopefully this is correct and gets you some help. if I am wrong please correct me. Have a wonderful day! :)
Answer:
The cold temperatures also come from the cold water on the coast. You would only see warm temperatures if there would be a wind coming down from the nearby Andes mountain range. The situation of Lima in Peru is basically similar to what affects cities such as San Diego, USA and Tijuana, Mexico.
Explanation:
A credible narrator or reliable narrator will tell the story from the point of view of the truth, it does not matter if she or he has any attachment to what is going on in the story, readers can trust their words and understand the circumstances the way they the story unfolds. On the other hand, the unreliable narrator will tell their story from their point of view, they will embelish their deeds, hide or down play their problems, therefore the reader will always have the impression that the unreliable narrator is conducing the reader to trust them.
The crediable narrator will bring the facts to the reader and put the reader in the story, the reader can have the feeling of engagement on the narration. On the other hand, the unreliable narrator brings the uncertainty feeling tothe reader and the reader can dot the i's as they please because they know they cannot fully trust the narrator.
