A
Explanation: The appeal of Jackson to the ordinary man helped lead to the new period known as "the common man era." As president, Andrew Jackson embraced the role of protecting "common men"—his decisions in matters such as the rotation of office holders can be argued as being in their interest.
Answer:
The case referred to in the question is Dred Scott v. Sandford.
Explanation:
Dred Scott was an eslaved man from Virginia who worked for a few years in Huntsville, Alabama. Years later he was taken by his owners to the Missouri territory.
Because the most of the Missouri territory was designated as "free", when his owners tried to take him back slave territory, Dred Scott sued them arguing that having set foot in free territory, he was now a freeman.
The Supreme Court ruled against him: it ruled that black people were not citizens and could not seek the protections and rights that the U.S. constitution granted to citizens.
It was justified through the Mandate of heaven. Basically. It was thought that only one legitimate ruler could be the ruler of china. And whoever that one ruler was, he was blessed with godlike powers.
Hoped this help :P
The Embargo Act of 1807 stopped trade with England, thus decreasing American production. FALSE.
