Answer:
I would be a Federalist.
Explanation:
the main difference between the federalist and anti-federalists is on their opinion on how much power the central government should have over the states.
Federalist wanted the government to have more power and the anti-federalist wanted the government to have less power. In Hindsight, anti-federalists' idea sounds better. Since it will give the government less influence to disrupt the people.
But considering the issues that they faced at the time, I believe more government power was necessary.
The earlier draft of the constitution did not provide the central government with crucial power such as ability to collect taxes or create a centralized military. Both of those issues were supported by the Federalist.
They wanted a new strong national government with checks and balances. they didn't want the 3 branches to abuse their power with the state so they wanted them to check each other
Answer:
"answer"
Explanation:
According to my research on different law terminology, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the initial pleading being mentioned is called an "answer". This (like mentioned in the question) is when the defendant can either concede the validity of the allegations being made in the plaintiff's accusation or completely deny it. This is usually asked as a direct question by the judge, in which you must answer guilty or not guilty.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
A. Participants will gain knowledge of the fibre content of foods is the correct answer
Explanation:
The statements that define the expected goals of the curriculum is known as learning objective. It demonstrates the skills which will be be learned by the student after instruction. They are important factors of the strategies for pedagogical scenarios and instruction design models and lesson plans. They are mostly found in the beginning of a chapter or unit.
Answer:
A relationship that lacks both intimacy and passion is an example of empty love.
Explanation:
Sternberg's triangular theory of love explains that there are three components to love - like three vertices in a triangle. Those components are commitment, passion, and intimacy. Different types of love are formed depending on the components that can be observed in the relationship.
Empty love has only one of the three components: commitment. There is no passion or intimacy. It is often the result of another type of love that has deteriorated. It is commonly found in a relationship in which the couple remains together out of obligation - for instance, because they have children.
