Corporations are often accused of despoiling the environment in their quest for profit. Free enterprise is supposedly incompatible with environmental preservation so that government regulation is required.
Such thinking is the basis for current proposals to expand environmental regulation greatly. So many new controls have been proposed and enacted that the late economic journalist Warren Brookes once forecast that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could well become "the most powerful government agency on earth, involved in massive levels of economic, social, scientific, and political spending and interference.
But if the profit motive is the primary cause of pollution, one would not expect to find much pollution in socialist countries, such as the former Soviet Union, China, and in the former Communist countries of Eastern and Central Europe. That is, in theory. In reality, exactly the opposite is true: The socialist world suffers from the worst pollution on earth. Could it be that free enterprise is not so incompatible with environmental protection after all?
Absolutely random question, but I would use a large hammer and smash my rock to piece. :/
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the last option. Environmental geography bridges physical and human geography. Environmental geography is an aspect of geography that delves into the relationship, including the social, economic and spatial interconnections, between people and their environments.<span> </span>
introduction of deadly diseases, forced slavery by some nations, and forced colonization by Europeans
Answer:
Maria's car today,has a pollution emissions devices installed in the car,that lessen the effect of its emission to the environment
Explanation:
The clean air amendment bill of 1990 has made car manufacturers install emission control devices like the EGR valve,catalytic converter,air pump to car to help mitigate air pollution
