1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mihalych1998 [28]
4 years ago
8

Which new password is the strongest alternative to the weak password: "ilovedogs"?

History
2 answers:
n200080 [17]4 years ago
3 0

Alternative A would be the best one. D) " $iL0V3dGs6! "

Alternative A is the strongest for a number of reasons. First of all, it starts and ends with symbols, which is usually overlooked when creating passwords.

Another important feature it has is the alternation between upper and lower case letters, as well as numbers instead of letters when spelling the words.

It uses pretty much all of the necessary elements that make a password strong and secure.


Pavel [41]4 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is D.

All the password formats proposed are equally safe because all of them contain the same elements, that contribute to make it more secure: capital letters, lower-case letters, and symbols such as the "!" or the "@". Moreover, they all include alternation between capital letters and the lower case ones.

You might be interested in
As in most other places, Islam's conversion rate in southeast Asia was enhanced by the work of
Paraphin [41]
As in most other places, Islam's conversion rate in southeast Asia was enhanced by the work of "<span>missionaries," since these people were instrumental in spreading the beliefs of the religion to others. </span>
7 0
4 years ago
Help please
Dafna11 [192]

a
Support a large population, which eventually formed into cities
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. A republic is a form of government without
Art [367]

1. B. a monarch

A republic is a form of government that doesn't have monarch as its head. In the republics, the supreme power lies within the people. The people are the ones that have the power to vote and choose who to represent them, thus who to be in charge of the country for a particular time. If the people are satisfied with the politicians they have elected, they will elect them again, if they are not happy with them, they will elect other politicians to replace them, thus punishing them for their bad ruling.

2. B. They passed laws and decides on tax rates

The consuls in the Roman Republic had a very important role in the Roman politics. They were the ones that were in charge of the senate, thus they were the ones that were making the decisions in Rome. It is easy to see how big of a rile they in the fact that they were the ones that were passing the laws, as well as determining the taxation. Even the military was under their control, so the actions of the military were their responsibility, and if they needed it, they had it at disposal at any time.

3. B. Separate branches of government make, enforce, and interpret laws

The United States government has lot of similarities with the manner in which ancient Rome was functioning. It can even be said that the government of the United States is just a modernized version of the Roman one. This can be seen in the manner in which the making, enforcing, and interpretation of laws is performed. It is not single body of the government that does this, but instead there's several that are included in the process, all with their own specific task, and with the purpose being to not permit a single body to have absolute power, thus protecting the interest of the the people.

4. 1. In both, the United States and ancient Rome, lot of people were stripped of the right to vote. This can be put to a common reason for both, as the people that were stripped of voting were the slaves. The United States needed lot of slaves as work force, and in its interest at that time was that they keep the slaves in the dark. They didn't needed a population that was going to be educated and in touch with all the things, as that ind of population was not going to do the work of the field, thus they were not given basic rights. The Romans were well aware of how much the slaves hated them, and even if given the rights they deserved, they were going to turn against them eventually, so they were trying to keep them as tight as possible.

  2. These rules started to change over time though, as the slaves were becoming more and more integral part of the societies, and also they started to ask for their rights, which led to gradual improvement in their rights, including the voting ones. The slaves saw that the societies are heavily dependent on them economically, so once they saw an opportunity when the economy was not in great shape, they started to revolt and ask for their rights, thus playing well tactically at the right time, and eventually wining the status of equal citizens as everyone else.

  3. If this hadn't happened though, the United States nowadays would have been a much different place fro living. The white population would have been in charge of everything. The migration would have been regulated in a manner in which only people from certain race or ethnicity can come in. Millions of people would have had no basic human rights and would have been treated like animals, working for the white population to accumulate wealth. There would have been no mixing of cultures, yet alone of genes.

3 0
4 years ago
What would you identify as
ale4655 [162]

Answer: 1) change of the lifestyle: people whose ancesters lived in rural areas moved to the cities and towns (urbanization), 2) very fast change of the lifestyle (in the case of European industrial revolution). This radical change took place with 1-2 generations which had very bad consequences on mental health of European population.

Explanation: Industrial started in England already in 18th century, but lated was spread also to European continent. Industrialization means automatically urbanization. These two changes took place very quickly. Rural people wanted to adopt bourgeoise lifestyle and earn more money so they moved to cities and towns and worked in factories. It had a very devastating influence on them and their children.  Freud describes that succintly in "Unbehagen in der Kultur" (1930). Probably the worst (the fastest) it was in Germany.

4 0
3 years ago
What was the purpose of the congress of vienna
NARA [144]

Answer:

To keep balance of power in Europe--> no domination of one state in Europe

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which geographic factor of Korea most directly influenced the spread of Chinese culture to Japan?
    15·1 answer
  • How did english settlers in north america interact with indians, africans, and witches?
    8·1 answer
  • 1. George Washington’s Farewell Address gave a strong message about foreign policy. What was it? How did John Adams and Thomas J
    14·1 answer
  • The supreme court case marbury v.Madison happened because
    14·1 answer
  • What happened too gandhi and why did it happen?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did river transport become important?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the development of steel, oil, transportation, comminucation, and business practices affect the US economy
    11·1 answer
  • Why Indian are so cute<br>if yes then join <br>zmk-edix-tuv​
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the Visigoth general Alaric invade Rome? (1 point)
    6·2 answers
  • A group of scientists has tools to study earthquakes. But there are only enough tools for one location. The scientists have a ch
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!