Answer:
Ironically, what the wife and everyone else failed to notice was that the "singing" was the howl of a "werewolf".
Explanation:
Ironically, what the wife and everyone else failed to notice was that the "singing" was the howl of a "werewolf".
Lodge Meeting nights, more and more often they had him to lead the singing because he had beautiful voice, and he’d lead off strong, while the others always following and joining in, high voices and low. It brings the shivers on me now to think of it, hearing it, nights when I’d stayed home from meeting when the children was babies — the singing coming up through the trees there, and the moonlight, summer nights, the full moon shining. I’ll never hear anything so beautiful. I’ll never know a joy like that again.
Yes, you are right. The answer for this would be the first option. The authors of "Alabanza" and "The Grass" have in common is that, both of their works convey a <span>deep respect of nature. Alabanza was written by Martin Espada, and The Grass was written by Carl Sandburg. Hope this answers your question. Have a great day!</span>
Answer:
First person
Explanation: Because it keeps stating I, my
so first person
Answer:
which oneyeeyusudududduududud
Explanation:
jyeieieiwiwiwieie
Answer:
Compared to brand name goods, generic food packaging displays the brand of the product at a consistently higher frequency. Also, generic food packages contain a higher ratio of brand to product name frequency, with generic packaging slightly favoring brand over product and vice versa for brand name packaging. This suggests that generic brands may be more anxious to establish themselves as brands offering a multitude of other products. Additionally, the tendency of brand name products to reference product rather than brand name is perhaps the result of a specific product having more widespread recognition than the overall brand. (For example, the Oreo cookies have far more widespread recognition than the brand itself, Nabisco.) With the exception of Malt-O-Meal, generic brands are far less likely to encourage consumers to interact with the company through internet or phone participation. I suspect that this trend is due to limited resources—generic brands may lack to funds to invest in developing a robust website or mobile phone app when these services are supplementary to their products. Brand name packaging tends to incorporate “participatory” bonus material, such as printing a game or activity on the back of the box or asking consumers to visit a website or download a mobile phone app. Generic packaging pulls ahead for featuring backstories or recipes.
