Answer:
Olmec
Explanation:
The Olmec was America's first civilization (not the first people). A estimate of 8,000-4000 B.C. It is not known exactly when they arrived. Recent research suggests that the Olmec had its origin in Tabasco's early farming crops which began between 5100 BCE and 4600 BCE.
Answer: The expansion of railway lines throughout the West
Explanation:
To say that the Railroad only contributed minutely to the development of the United States as a nation would be a gross injustice. The establishment of railway lines to any part of the country brought prosperity and drove its development.
This was especially true for states in the west such as Washington, Idaho, Montana, Utah and Wyoming. With the expansion of railway lines throughout the west and into these territories, their populations increased and enabled the states to press for and get awarded with statehood.
Answer:
The Nazis viewed the Jews as inferior to them.
Explanation:
The Nazis considered themselves a superior race, and this led to the abuse and death of Jews.
The "Elastic Clause" of the Constitution grants Congress power to pass unspecified laws "necessary and proper" for the exercise of its expressed powersImplied powers have often been controversialOver time, Congress's powers have grown as more and more kinds of government activity have been
Answer:
Explanation:
Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. Here the phrase “overall consequences” of an action means everything the action brings about, including the action itself. For example, if you think that the whole point of morality is (a) to spread happiness and relieve suffering, or (b) to create as much freedom as possible in the world, or (c) to promote the survival of our species, then you accept consequentialism. Although those three views disagree about which kinds of consequences matter, they agree that consequences are all that matters. So, they agree that consequentialism is true. The utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham is a well known example of consequentialism. By contrast, the deontological theories of John Locke and Immanuel Kant are nonconsequentialist.
Consequentialism is controversial. Various nonconsequentialist views are that morality is all about doing one’s duty, respecting rights, obeying nature, obeying God, obeying one’s own heart, actualizing one’s own potential, being reasonable, respecting all people, or not interfering with others—no matter the consequences.
This article describes different versions of consequentialism. It also sketches several of the most popular reasons to believe consequentialism, along with objections to those reasons, and several of the most popular reasons to disbelieve it, along with objections to those reasons.
