Below are the differences between Bentham’s and Mill’s respective versions of utilitarianism:
1. The qualitative distinction
Bentham pots concede to any distinction in propensities yet
Mill arranged human inclinations and by ethical news of subjective contrast
called some honorable and another base. Along these lines, it is said that
scholarly propensities are far better than physiological inclinations.
2. Qualitative distinction in pleasures:
Similarly, Mill made subjective refinements in various joys. As indicated
by Bentham, all delights are comparable. In the event that the amount of joy is
the same, at that point, there is no distinction amongst verse and pushpin. As
opposed to this, as indicated by Mill, 'It is ideal to be a person disappointed
than a pig fulfilled, better to be a Socrates disappointed than a trick
fulfilled.
The answer to your first question would be C. The answer to your second question is B.
It was because they attack pearl
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that the North had better industrial capabilities, which allowed them to produce more war materials. </span></span>
Ending slavery means it will stop for sure, mean while ending the slavery trade means you won't be making more trades but slavery still exist.
Hope this helps! :)