Answer for the second
'Released from foreign war, we would probably be plunged into all the misery of anarchy and intestine war. Can we suppose that the people of the south, would submit to having the seat of Empire at Philadelphia, or New England; or that the people oppressed by a change of government, contrasting their misery with their former happy state, would not invite Britain to reassume the sovereignty.” — James Chalmers, Plain Truth, 1776
If the one above is the argument, you might consider that the colonists did obtain independence from England. That by itself was something that Chalmers always thought to be impossible without serious repercussions. He used to say that in the case of achieving freedom, America would just end up being attacked and maybe even colonized by some other country. What happened, thought, was that after the revolution, other countries gained respect for America as an opponent and the country was eventually left to be.
<em>D. Restore dignity and independence to those countries.</em>
Explanation:
When the United States joined World War I on the side of the Allies, they didn't necessarily want to. President Woodrow Wilson was a pacifist, he strived for peace. He was against having the United States join a war, as he cared for his people and the country. After the Zimmerman Telegram, Wilson was left with no choice but to declare war.
Even during the war, Woodrow Wilson's peaceful approaches shined through. His main goal was to create peace, not only for the United States but for everyone. He wrote the Fourteen Points, which was an outline for peace on all sides.
The Fourteen Points were goals that were striving towards peace. Woodrow Wilson wanted German troops to be removed from lands like Belgium, so they could become independent and restore dignity to those countries. Not all people agreed with Wilson's approach, many thought Germany should have harsher repercussions after the war.
Explanation:
-That only the Catholic Church had the authority to interpret the Bible.
Answer:
the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people or things, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex.
Answer:
<u>Growth of economy</u>- Before the 1950 most of countries had interests in war industries as, less people wanted innovation and development of the market and as whole of the economy.
Explanation:
- As around the world people starting doing research work in the field of science and technology. As the IT sector developed into something new and big in the 1990's, and at the end of 1990's the government investment grew from 1% to 4 % in I.T industry. Software companies went on to introduce different applications and operating software's which led the stockholders to invest in that sector. The car manufacturers got fast on enhancing the productivity of its
- There was an enhance and more investment of the private sector after the 2000's as the rules and regulations got soft on them. So, it was a boost for the economy and had shown great development in that decade.
