Answer:
In lines 10–11 the speaker is referring to the importance of interpreting what is being read. On lines 20–21, the speaker shows that reading interpretation promotes knowledge and that knowledge is often a handicap for the soul.
Explanation:
In lines 10–11 the speaker is referring to the need that people have to interpret and understand what is being read, this is because if a person just reads, he is stuck with earthly life, he is limited to an environment, contained. However, the interpretation of reading makes the individual see beyond words and let go of this limitation.
However, once the reading has been interpreted, the individual gains knowledge, becomes detached from ignorance and is able to see things he did not see before. The problem is that this is often a disadvantage, showing that ignorance was a paradise, which was lost with the arrival of knowledge. This can be seen on lines 20–21.
Answer:
People should be held accountable for life or death situations that they had substantial influence in or control over.
Explanation:
Your question is rather vague and not based upon any sort of book so I decided to give you a general statement --- heads start on your thesis. Life can be very surprising and sometimes events that happen are unstoppable. But clearly in every circumstance where an individual has affected something they should be held accountable for the outcome of their actions. Hope this helps.
I don’t think so, it’s not really comparing anything
