Answer:
Im pretty sure the answer is y=375x+73
Im not really sure
The bisector of an angle is a segment or a ray that passes through the vertex and splits it into two congruent angles.
Hope this is of great help to you, and happy studying~!
~Mistermistyeyed.
A LR parser is called a shift-reduce algorithm, because in most cases it either shifts the next lexeme of input onto the parse stack or reduces the handle that is on top of the stack.
<u>Explanation:</u>
A parser is that aspect of the compiler which practices a token string as input and with the sustenance of enduring grammar, transforms it into the identical parse tree. The LR parser is a non-recursive, shift-reduce, bottom-up parser. It utilizes a broad range of context-free grammar which gives it the most valuable syntax analysis procedure.
LR means that the data is examined left-to-right and that a rightmost source, in reverse, is assembled. LR parsers relish time and space extended in the size of the input. Practically all programming languages possess LR grammars.
Answer:
since the formula of a triangle is ab/2 and since there is four simply multiply 3x4 which is 12 and divide by 2 which is 6 and 6x4= 24 and add that tp 9 since the base is just 3x3 which results for an answer of 33.
Step-by-step explanation:
![\bf f(x)=y=2x+sin(x) \\\\\\ inverse\implies x=2y+sin(y)\leftarrow f^{-1}(x)\leftarrow g(x) \\\\\\ \textit{now, the "y" in the inverse, is really just g(x)} \\\\\\ \textit{so, we can write it as }x=2g(x)+sin[g(x)]\\\\ -----------------------------\\\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20f%28x%29%3Dy%3D2x%2Bsin%28x%29%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Ainverse%5Cimplies%20x%3D2y%2Bsin%28y%29%5Cleftarrow%20f%5E%7B-1%7D%28x%29%5Cleftarrow%20g%28x%29%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ctextit%7Bnow%2C%20the%20%22y%22%20in%20the%20inverse%2C%20is%20really%20just%20g%28x%29%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ctextit%7Bso%2C%20we%20can%20write%20it%20as%20%7Dx%3D2g%28x%29%2Bsin%5Bg%28x%29%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A-----------------------------%5C%5C%5C%5C)
![\bf \textit{let's use implicit differentiation}\\\\ 1=2\cfrac{dg(x)}{dx}+cos[g(x)]\cdot \cfrac{dg(x)}{dx}\impliedby \textit{common factor} \\\\\\ 1=\cfrac{dg(x)}{dx}[2+cos[g(x)]]\implies \cfrac{1}{[2+cos[g(x)]]}=\cfrac{dg(x)}{dx}=g'(x)\\\\ -----------------------------\\\\ g'(2)=\cfrac{1}{2+cos[g(2)]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ctextit%7Blet%27s%20use%20implicit%20differentiation%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A1%3D2%5Ccfrac%7Bdg%28x%29%7D%7Bdx%7D%2Bcos%5Bg%28x%29%5D%5Ccdot%20%5Ccfrac%7Bdg%28x%29%7D%7Bdx%7D%5Cimpliedby%20%5Ctextit%7Bcommon%20factor%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A1%3D%5Ccfrac%7Bdg%28x%29%7D%7Bdx%7D%5B2%2Bcos%5Bg%28x%29%5D%5D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5B2%2Bcos%5Bg%28x%29%5D%5D%7D%3D%5Ccfrac%7Bdg%28x%29%7D%7Bdx%7D%3Dg%27%28x%29%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A-----------------------------%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Ag%27%282%29%3D%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%2Bcos%5Bg%282%29%5D%7D)
now, if we just knew what g(2) is, we'd be golden, however, we dunno
BUT, recall, g(x) is the inverse of f(x), meaning, all domain for f(x) is really the range of g(x) and, the range for f(x), is the domain for g(x)
for inverse expressions, the domain and range is the same as the original, just switched over
so, g(2) = some range value
that means if we use that value in f(x), f( some range value) = 2
so... in short, instead of getting the range from g(2), let's get the domain of f(x) IF the range is 2
thus 2 = 2x+sin(x)
![\bf 2=2x+sin(x)\implies 0=2x+sin(x)-2 \\\\\\ -----------------------------\\\\ g'(2)=\cfrac{1}{2+cos[g(2)]}\implies g'(2)=\cfrac{1}{2+cos[2x+sin(x)-2]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%202%3D2x%2Bsin%28x%29%5Cimplies%200%3D2x%2Bsin%28x%29-2%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A-----------------------------%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Ag%27%282%29%3D%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%2Bcos%5Bg%282%29%5D%7D%5Cimplies%20g%27%282%29%3D%5Ccfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%2Bcos%5B2x%2Bsin%28x%29-2%5D%7D)
hmmm I was looking for some constant value... but hmm, not sure there is one, so I think that'd be it
