1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
padilas [110]
3 years ago
7

What was the goal of European missionaries as they travel to the rain forests of central Africa

History
1 answer:
olasank [31]3 years ago
5 0
The main goal of the European missionaries for travelling to the rain forests of Central Africa was to spread the religion of Christianity among the poor people living there. The working class of the region was the main target of the missionaries. They tried to bring spiritual enlightenment and salvation to the workers and their families. The missionaries also brought with them the western style of education to central africa. They also tried to teach the importance of monogamy among the people of this region. It was not always easy for the missionaries as they were often threatened by the constant warfare among the Africans.
You might be interested in
Why were the jobs that women did during WW1 vital:<br>PLEASE HELP!​
OlgaM077 [116]

Answer:

according to depts.washington.edu

<em>World War I was to give women a chance to show a male-dominated society that they could do more than simply bring up children and stay at home. In World War I, women played a vital role in keeping soldiers equipped with ammunition and in many senses they kept the nation moving through their help in various industries.</em>

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
African primary traded with what merchants along trans-saharan trade routes
gtnhenbr [62]
Slave holders, hope this helps. =)

6 0
3 years ago
What is the main source of trade for Zimbabwe ?
Maurinko [17]

Answer:

10 mins ago?sheesh,but i got you m8

Explanation:

The principal imports are fuels and petroleum products, electricity, machinery and transport equipment, food, and miscellaneous manufactured goods. Zimbabwe's trading partners include South Africa and other African countries, the United States, China, and some countries of the EU.

i hope this answer helps man.

6 0
3 years ago
Mary's free response to the mission given to her by god is called
ch4aika [34]
Mary’s mission from God was to show people the way of obedience, love, and to follow the path of faith Jesus and God himself.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do a select group of multinational corporations dominate the world economy
    14·1 answer
  • Which headline provides the best example of a first amendment guarantee in action
    7·1 answer
  • Which situation best illustrates the political process of gerrymandering?
    8·1 answer
  • In order to learn about the experiences of Muslims living in non-Muslim countries, a historian surveys Muslims who have immigrat
    5·2 answers
  • What tactics were used by the north Vietnamese that was so harmful to the American soldiers?
    5·1 answer
  • An agreement signed by Italy and Germany to strengthen their military and political relationship
    5·2 answers
  • Laicifitra I need the true words​
    12·1 answer
  • How did alliances lead to france joining the war
    13·2 answers
  • If you were Andrew Jackson, what would you do about the Native Americans?
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE DO THIS QUESTION ASAP! BRAINILEST!BRAINILEST!BRAINILEST!BRAINILEST!BRAINILEST!BRAINILEST!BRAINILEST!BRAINILEST!BRAINILEST
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!