Wide leaps and and dissonant intervals
<u>Matching the scenarios to the </u><u>level of education</u><u> </u>
Kaylen set up the lighting system used for the production of a television broadcast ----------------------------> Vocational certification
Pierce synchronizes the sounds and dialogue of a television program with the actions in the program --------------> Associate's degree
Glenn works with film staff to identify the locations in a film that cue specific music.---------------------------> Bachelor's degree
<h3>Difference between a Vocational certification and bachelor's degree</h3>
A vocational certification is required for Jobs requiring a physical skill set more than an intellectual skill set. Kaylen setting up the lighting systems for the production of a television broadcast requires more of a physical skill set therefore a vocational certification is needed. while
An associate degree is required for Jobs requiring a higher level of intellectual skill set higher than a regular intellectual skill set required for a bachelor's degree.
Hence we can conclude that the answers to your question are as listed above.
Learn more about types of certification : brainly.com/question/27409442
#SPJ1
Answer:
There is an old question that has entertained the minds of many thinkers who look to art and wonder whether it is a mirror offering a reflection of life itself. Art has the power to evoke the same emotions, thoughts, moral and ethical controversies, and conflicts that we experience in life. Anyone who has had a personal reaction towards a work of art will be in agreement. What is it then about the essence of art and the essence of life that are so unmistakably different? Is it a possibility that art gives humans the opportunity to experience phenomena that are not accessible in quotidian life? Is art merely an imitation of life as Plato once asserted with such conviction, or is art a freestanding sphere in which humans can learn in exceptional ways? Through the deliberation of such questions the artist can perhaps move closer towards understanding his tremendous capacity to illustrate our existence in a distinct and remarkable way.
The Greek philosopher Plato declared the artist to be “an imitator of images and is very far removed from the truth” (Republic X, 27). Plato was certain that art was nothing but a dangerous and shallow imitation of life that served only to draw humans far away from the Truth. This unique concept of ‘Truth’ refers to the idea that the purest existence of any given thing lies not in the physical manifestation of the thing itself, but rather in its invisible and eternal ‘Form’. Let us take an example of a table vs. The Table. Any given table is a table that has been modeled after the eternal form of The Table. Somewhere in an otherworldly domain, alongside all the other eternal forms of the universe, exists the One and Only Table in all its truth, purity, and Tablehood. The carpenter may look towards but not at the Form of the Table (or else the carpenter would be God and at which point probably no longer a carpenter) in order to produce, or ‘mimic’ a lesser yet sufficient model of The Eternal Table. In a similar way the artist can be compared to the carpenter, only deserving of less respect according to Plato. The artist does not look to the Form of Beauty, say, but rather looks to the physical image or projection of Beauty. This removes him even further from Truth than any other ordinary laborer. The artist is in this way an imitator, and art is a ‘mimesis’ or imitation of the visual display of Eternal Forms such as Beauty. Consequently it is Plato’s persuasion that art as a mere impression of life is detrimental to the inner soul and its understanding of righteous Truths.
Explanation:
is this the type of essay you're looking for?
I don’t have anaswer sorry just need points cause I’m stupibutgood luck
