I think that zoo's should not be banned. I think this because, a zoo, is a magical experience for kids! All those animals, helpful to the world in their own way, the second reason I think zoo's shouldn’t be banned is that zoo's are a place to keep animals, the zoo keeps care for. The third reason is that there are many zoo keepers, who have that as a job, zoos are magical places and it would be unfair to ban them.
One reason I think zoos shouldn’t be banned is that zoos are magical places, and a wonderful experience for kids of all age. For example, when I was little, I went to a zoo! It was a great day! I got to see so many animals! I really enjoyed my time there!
Another reason I think zoos shouldn’t be banned is that animals are there, and are cared for. For example, many animals stay at zoos, it’s like their home! And it would be devastating if they lost their home.
The last reason I think zoos shouldn’t be banned is that people work at zoos. For example, people work a zoos to get money for food, a home, and much more! So I think it would be very unfair to them, if zoos would be banned, and of course they can get other jobs, but zoo keeping, is a very unique job, they are passionate for.
This is why I think zoos should not be banned.
Answer : D
Reason : Adjusting is changing and this is what is what animals do to get used to an unfamiliar environment.
Your attitude will be negative.
In "chicago" , Sandburg use rhyming and rhythm in his verbs. The usage of this verbs make "chicago" is really interesting to read and the readers can't help but to feel some sort of excitement by reading it
I believe it would be an adjective clause because it describes Professor Plum. Hope I helped!
