“One of the strangest controversies in the history of Orientalism turned upon the “origin of bhakti”, as if devotion had at some given moment been a new idea and thenceforth a fashionable one. It would have been simpler to observe that the word bhakti means primarily a given share, and therefore also the devotion or love that all liberality presupposes; and so that inasmuch as one “gives God his share” (bhagam), i.e. sacrifces, one is his bhakta. Thus in the hymn, “If thou givest me my share” amounts to saying “If thou lovest me”. It has often been pointed out that the Sacrifice was thought of as a commerce between Gods and men: but not often realised that by introducing into traditional conceptions of trade notions derived from our own internecine commercial transactions, we have falsified our understanding of the original sense of such a commerce, which was actually more of the potlatsh type, a competition in giving, than like our competitions in taking.
Huh ? Is that a question ?
The separte but equal schools where not equal in many ways. the african american schools where poorly funded and got hand me down book that were often out of date and falling apart. teacher where often under paid and
<span />
Answer: Most Gods represented a form in nature. For example, Sun God, Kinih, Ahous, Maize God or the Yum Kaax who helped/did the Mayans worship/ritual
Hess's law allows you to find the net enthalpy of the magnesium combustion by adding the enthalpies of intermediate reactions. The <span>Hess's </span>Law<span> of Constant </span>Heat Summation states that<span> the total enthalpy change for the reaction is the sum of all changes</span> (no matter how many stages the reaction has).
